A frightening article has appeared in LifeSiteNews, reporting the development of a vaccine administration method using a substrate in the form of a host, closely resembling the host we consume in the Holy Eucharist. Can anyone miss the demonic implications of such a project?
LifeSiteNews Excerpts:
“May 28, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – A team of researchers from the Universities of Minnesota and Texas [and the Mayo Clinic] have developed a polymer ‘wafer,’ which bears a striking resemblance to the host used at a Catholic Mass, that they predict could become the vaccine of the future. The study, published in the peer reviewed medical journal, Journal of Controlled Release, explained that the membrane on the underside of the tongue leant itself to absorbing drugs very effectively. [They] already proved that the wafer works with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) proteins, and has been designed with a potential future HIV vaccine in mind.”
In a press release from the University of Minnesota, Chun Wang, one of the study’s authors and associate professor in the university’s College of Science and Engineering, expressed hope that the technology could revolutionise the future of vaccines. “This is just a small step in this long journey,” Wang said. “If we continue this line of work, it can bring us to a point where we will have vaccines — they could be based on DNA, RNA, proteins — that can be stored without refrigeration and easily delivered under the tongue at the sublingual site. They will be quickly disseminated throughout the world because they don’t rely on certain equipment and preservation…. This will be particularly good for low-resource regions of the world, even in America….”
Lifesite continues: “Should it come to be used as a means to deliver COVID-19 vaccines, comparisons would certainly be drawn between what has been described as the ‘church’ of COVID and the Catholic Church’s own sacramental rites.” Archbishop Viganò, former Papal Nuncio to the United States, described the global adherence to the authoritarian COVID measures as being akin to a religious observance. In light of Pope Francis’s reception of the abortion-tainted injections and subsequent dictate that everyone must take the injection, Archbishop Viganò wrote: ‘The bleak Paul VI Audience Hall has been emblematically chosen as the temple in which to celebrate this new sanitary rite, officiated by ministers of the Covid religion in order to assure, certainly not the salvation of souls, but rather the illusory promise of health for the body…. Viganò earlier described the COVID-19 measures as being part of a ‘pseudo-health regime’ governed by people both inside and outside of the Church who were ‘people corrupt in the soul and sold out to Satan.'”
The LifeSite article concludes with the quote: “The apparent result seems to be a new form of scientism, reincarnated to solve the COVID problem with vaccines to be accepted fideistically (with blind faith), and perhaps nominating itself as the new moral authority of this age, one that demands an act of faith towards the modern religion, the scientific one.” (Continued below picture.)
|
Suddenly, I saw the fiasco reported in CF last June 25 as possibly far more significant than just a few scaredy-cat priests avoiding COVID by disrespectfully using tweezers on the Holy Eucharist, but rather as almost a pilot test to see if priests and laity would actually accept such a practice to secretly administer vaccine to Catholics who would otherwise refuse the experimental potion. (Put ‘tweezer’ into the CF Search bar to come up with several ‘hits’ from the St. John of Rochester events.) Acceptance of the use of tweezers on the Body of Christ by clergy and laity removes one obstacle, perhaps the linchpin assumption, that could lead to tricking the laity into accepting a vaccine they don’t want or even their cooperating with administration of the mark of the beast to the unwary. Think. Why else would the progressives want to so closely mimic the host? And who but the evil one would have such a vested interest in attacking God’s flock through the Holy Sacrament? Would Pope Francis even permit consecrating matter tainted by vaccine? Well, he already preached that the Body of Christ (the People of God) should accept the vaccine, and turn themselves over to contamination, didn’t he? It’s not much of a stretch, is it?
Please visit the CF post “Jesus in Baggies” here: Cleansing Fire – Jesus in Baggies at St. John of Rochester to see Geezer Tweezers at work.
|
There is only one prospective oral SARSCoV2 aka COVID19 vaccine VAXART which started phase 1 study using testing of a commonly known human coronavirus (not SARS-CoV2/COVID19)on animals in the laboratory,and then, on a handful of human volunteers, to see if oral vaccination with any coronavirus in a yeast tablet, could develop antibodies and provide immunity.Their public relations spokesman states that it sounds “promising.” The same company has been attempting to develop an oral flu vaccine for many years.
The scientific community thinks that if any non- injection vaccine holds promise in the future, it would be one delivered by nasal spray, because SARS CoV2 is contracted via the airways.
The downside to oral vaccines, is that they have always contained a live virus. Oral polio vaccines were not without risks, because of this. To date, there have only been long standing oral vaccines for: rotavirus,adenovirus,cholera,and typhoid which have been widely used. These oral vaccines haven’t been widely used in the United States, but they are used for standard travel vaccines in the U.K. ( because they are cheaper?) I have been vaccinated for almost everything that someone who had measles, mumps, rubella,and chicken pox, as a child (I have year titers done)could have, including all of my travel vaccines for doing medical missions, shingles vaccine, three pneumavax 13 vaccines, and the new pneumavax 23 vaccine, Tdap every five years, Hepatitis A, Hepatitis B, all given by injection.
The aforementioned oral vaccines have been given to large,crowded populations,in developing countries (formerly referred to as third world countries) during times of major disease outbreaks and public health crises, in order to save lives, and prevent continued infection among crowded populations. In these cases, the benefits outweighed the risks. I would expect that any oral or nasal vaccines for COVID 19, should they ever become available,would be utilized in these developing countries, among large,crowded populations, in the midst of an overwhelming health crisis,to save lives, where there aren’t enough trained,skilled healthcare workers to administer injected vaccines among a vast number of individuals. If anyone has received a COVID 19 vaccine, he or she will realize that it is highly regulated with reporting your name,and DOB, to the CDC and your dates of vaccination, with the type of vaccines you received and the lot number of each vaccine. You receive a CDC card with the information on it which was sent to the CDC. Every vaccination that an individual receives is recorded with the date received, the company which manufactured the vaccine, the lot number and the expiration date of the vaccine. Since electronic healthcare records have been used in all healthcare systems in the United States,each vaccination is scanned and logged in electronically, on a patient with all of this information,at the time of vaccination. These injected vaccines are expensive,and either your health care insurance, your employer, your state, or you, will be paying for a vaccination. I can’t imagine how a concentrated yeast pill with the SARS CoV2 oral vaccine (if it is even found effective) could be passed off as a Communion Host. Communion wafers or hosts which are used by most Catholic churches and Catholic Dioceses are shipped from monasteries and convents who make this as part of their ministry and means of support. My sister’s sister in law was a Discalced Carmelite Nun for her entire adult life, until she died in 2018,and went to be with her Bridegroom Forever. She was actually allowed to visit us on occasion, as her parents became elderly and ill. She would discuss in detail how they all made, packaged, and shipped communion to churches throughout the United States. This might be a time for scripture study, reading of traditional books, including From The Depths of Our Hearts, written by Pope Emeritus XVI and Robert Cardinal Sarah in 2020, Jesus of Nazareth, written by Pope Emeritus XVI and published in 2012. The Pandemic of Padre Pio: Disciple of Our Lady of Sorrows by Stephano DiCampanella is inspirational reading for our time. Praying the Daily Office and Praying the Rosary is of great benefit,as well as intercessory prayer for others.
I will only address the possibility of priests sneaking the COVID 19 vaccine via the Communion wafer to unsuspecting communicants that you proposed in your post.
There is currently no COVID vaccine wafer given sublingually available for use, but if there was, I do not think that scenario would happen for the following reasons:
1. There would be the likelihood of delivering a COVID 19 vaccine via a consecrated Communion wafer to those who have already been fully vaccinated or partly vaccinated with a specific COVID 19 vaccine. The concern would be a person receiving too much of a COVID vaccine within a certain period of time, and also if the type of vaccine received via Communion wafer and its method of replicating the spike protein,would be in conflict with the type of vaccine and method of replicating spike protein already received.
Those who are frequent Mass goers, especially daily communicants, would be sure to get an overdose of COVID 19 vaccine.
2. Medication given sublingually is administered under the tongue. Communion wafers are administered directly on top of the tongue or in the hand of the communicant to place in their mouth, and then the communion wafer is either swallowed or chewed and swallowed, spending a very short time in the mouth. It enters the esophagus and then the stomach, whose gastric juices would render a vaccine inactive. To effectively administer any medication sublingually, you need the patient’s cooperation, as they have to hold the medication under their tongue for a specified length of time until the medication is dissolved and absorbed.
3. The priest and those he delegates to assist him dispensing Holy Communion, would in essence, be deputized healthcare providers if they were dispensing a COVID 19 vaccine via communion wafers. The priest and Diocese would be responsible for the vaccine they administered, and the communicants to which they administered it. They would not be able to keep records of who they administered the COVID 19 vaccine via communion wafer to as communicants are not asked to give or verify their identity, and no one keeps track of who receives Holy Communion. There are persons who visit and persons who frequent different churches. DO YOU HONESTLY THINK THAT A DIOCESE WOULD PUT THEMSELVES IN A POSITION OF LIABILITY, ALLOWING THEMSELVES TO BE SUED ONCE PEOPLE FIND OUT THEY WERE GIVEN A VACCINE COVERTLY VIA A COMMUNION WAFER? AND ANY NUMBER OF PEOPLE WOULD BE ELIGIBLE TO SUE SINCE IDENTITIES WEREN’T CONFIRMED AND RECORDS WEREN’T KEPT.
4. Who would be paying for the sublingual COVID vaccine communion wafer? New technology would especially be expensive and can not see the Diocese or even the Vatican paying out large sums of money to pay for a COVID 19 vaccine to give out covertly to unsuspecting communicants in an effort to get everyone vaccinated against COVID 19.
5. There are different styles of liturgy and different priest personalities, but I cannot fathom any priest in the Diocese of Rochester participating in a covert operation to administer a new vaccine via communion wafer haphazardly, putting communicants at risk, and causing liability to themselves and the Diocese. I think the pastor of St. John of Rochester was attempting to use a technique to distribute communion to the home bound which would be considered less contaminated and less of a risk to those who might have a weaker immune system. To think he might be part of a pilot program to test out the feasibility of a COVID vaccine via wafer to communicants is a far stretch.
I do not think people will be forced to take a COVID vaccine, or be given it covertly. They will just have less opportunities to attend certain events or be given alternate seating.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/67-us-bishops-fail-to-halt-brother-bishops-tackling-problem-of-pro-abortion-politicians-receiving-communion?utm_source=LifeSiteNews.com&utm_campaign=f3c66afba9-Daily%2520Headlines%2520-%2520U.S._COPY_1051&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_12387f0e3e-f3c66afba9-401405341
The above link leads into the snakepit of fears and opinions of 67 bishops’ interfering with the protection and safety of the Holy Eucharist, such bishops being unworthy of the office. Read all the steps that must be taken before a pronouncement can be made of the the obvious, what every 8th grader could easily have enunciated before Vatican II. At each step of delay, the Holy Eucharist is further exposed to sacrilege. At least the 67 have emerged from their political cocoons, so there is no need for speculation regarding who is unfaithful to his duties. Now the list should be published, and the flock in every one of those dioceses press for the removal of all the wolves in shepherds’ clothing.
The objection letter of the 67 bishops requesting worthiness of reception of the Holy Eucharist at the USCCB upcoming meeting of “Eucharistic Consistency” is disconcerting and appalling.
Anyone Catholic who publicly condones abortion whether politician, clergy, religious, professor, author, speaker, or other influential position, and whether male or female, Democrat, Republican, or other party affiliation, should be first talked to privately by the bishop of their Diocese/See, to relay their error and conflict with Catholic Church teaching, and how that puts them in conflict with God and His creation. They should be told they should not receive Holy Eucharist until they change their platform and publicly denounce their previous error in supporting abortion. Many bishops are unwilling to cause a stir and rock the boat despite causing their stir and rocking that boat, first privately, out of concern for that person’s soul as well as championing the cause of the unborn. (There might be some who side with Pro-choice and abortion rights, but I think the majority do not want to rock the boat).
If more bishops would be shepherds of their flock when it comes to dealing with individuals in a serious deviation from Church teaching, Society and the Church might be in a better situation.