Cleansing Fire

Defending Truth and Tradition in the Roman Catholic Church

avatar

32nd Reason not to take the Vax — shedding?

May 4th, 2021, Promulgated by Diane Harris

Three months ago, we published an article with the link  Cleansing Fire – A Rabbi’s 31 Reasons for not taking The Vaccine . At the time, it seemed like one more opinion, well organized and thoughtful, on why the author, Rabbi Chananyn Weissman, had decided not to take the Vax. It turned out to be more than just an isolated opinion. It was perhaps a guiding light for some in their own decision making.

For at least the last five years CF has counted ‘hits’ in the first month in which a post is displayed. And never before have we had anything close to the number of hits on the Rabbi’s article. Multiples of previous #’s. It certainly seems to indicate particular interest in understanding the issues, and in choosing well in a life-and-death personal moral matter. And now we are able to see one illustration of the importance of #5 on the Rabbi’s list:

“The establishment insists that this medical treatment is safe.”

“They cannot possibly know this because the long-term effects are entirely unknown, and will not be known for many years.

They may speculate that it is safe, but it is disingenuous for them to make such a claim that cannot possibly be known.

Because they are being disingenuous, I do not trust them, and I want no part of their treatment.”

 

Several new pieces of information have appeared since the Rabbi’s list was published, including about deaths close to the time of vaccination, side effects like blindness and deafness, and — perhaps now the most relevant — contagion after the vax; i.e. that an unvaccinated person is at risk to be infected by covid sheddings of the vaccinated person!  And, to make matters worse, it seems not to be something that could be handled by, say, temporary isolation, as the ‘shedding’ continues to renew itself; i.e. to perpetuate. A movie with such a plot would not be credible, yet this seems to be the ‘real world’ in which we now begin to suffer.

Only a short week or two ago, those who refused the vax, for whatever reason, were being criticized for not being willing to be vaxed to protect the masses. The Pope was frequently quoted as saying Catholics (et al) had a moral obligation to be vaxed to protect the health of others.  Now it appears the opposite is true. It is the vaxed masses who pose the danger to the unvaxed! One bishop stated that for anyone to assist at Mass, he or she had to be fully vaccinated. Shouldn’t that now be restated that NO ONE who is vaxed should be allowed in the Sanctuary, putting others at risk?

Here are links to 3 of the articles:  More will be added if/when available.

The first one forecasts billions of deaths.

Brighteon

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/americas-frontline-doctors-covid-vaccinated-can-shed-spike-protein-harming-unvaccinated?utm_source=LifeSiteNews.com&utm_campaign=6f551a39d5-Daily%2520Headlines%2520-%2520U.S._COPY_1028&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_12387f0e3e-6f551a39d5-401405341

URGENT! 5 Doctors Agree that COVID-19 Injections are Bioweapons and Discuss What to do About It (rumble.com)

https://japantoday.com/category/features/kuchikomi/japan%27s-vaccination-rate-lowest-in-g7-here%27s-why

Johns Hopkins University Confirms That ‘Self-Spreading’ Vaccines Are Real (humansarefree.com)

Let’s reflect on the implicit moral question and contrast it to a key alleged reason for receiving the vax, i.e. to not contract covid, and then give that covid to another person. If shedding is indeed a vital issue, with no way (yet) to avoid being a multiple and consistent unwanted ‘donor’ of the ‘virus’ to others, then a key argument based on charity to others is reversed, in which case our protection of others requires we avoid being vaxed. Instead, we are then called to avoid the vax for the good of others! Remember the first law of medicine: Do no harm!  If shedding is a real issue now being presented and continues through indefinite regeneration, it may even be necessary for those who can’t or won’t take the vax to take prophylactic doses of Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine. It may be the most moral decision of all.

Let’s also remember #30 on the Rabbi’s list — when we finally get to  trust in God!

|

One Response to “32nd Reason not to take the Vax — shedding?”

  1. avatar Patriot23 says:

    Here are a couple of other reasons to not take the shot for the virus. Number 1, it IS NOT a vaccine. A vaccine or something that can be called a vaccine has to be approved by the FDA. This was not approved as a vaccine. It was approved as an emergency shot, not as a vaccine. It is strictly an experimental drug and like ALL experimental drugs, the effects are not known. In fact it probably will be years before the effects are known. Although we already do know some of the side effects that it is having on women. When you mix chemicals in your basement, maybe you will develop something to take the oil stains off your garage floor. Maybe you will blow up your entire block. Do you really want to take that chance? If someone has gotten this shot, they should put a magnet from their refrigerator on the spot where the shot was given. They will find the magnet sticks to their arm. People are not made of metal.

    The second reason for not taking the experimental drug is because apparently it does not work or does not work very well. All someone has to do to verify this is to check on how well it works on athletes and consider the fact that athletes are in better physical condition then most people. At 5 PM on Thursday I heard that 4 members of the New York Yankees, including their Shortstop all of whom of had been fully ‘vaccinated’ now had the virus. When I turned my computer on several hours later I learned the number was now 8 people. How come the 8 people got the shot yet they still got the virus? That shot does not seem to be very effective. Here are more thoughts. How much money does a doctor get paid if they send someone to get the shot? What is this mask/unmask propaganda? Is it exerting pressure on the people who exercise their freedom to not be stuck in the arm with what could be a dangerous substance? Could it be a plan that somehow splits the country into masked and unmasked sections? The people who have gotten the experimental shot are now free to walk around shedding the virus to other people while the people who want their freedom can not have it because somebody out there is shedding the virus. The United States of America has always been called the land of the Free! Yet, how free are we? When I am pressured from all sides to get an experimental drug, with unknown side effects, that does not feel like freedom. If I can not go to places I want to go because someone there will be shedding the virus, that is not freedom.

Leave a Reply


Log in | Register

You must be logged in to post a comment.


-Return to main page-