So– let’s get this straight. We don’t know if a vaccine will produce any immunity because we haven’t been through a re-infection cycle, but the government is reportedly willing to buy hundreds of million vaccine doses. WHY?

Oh! but a serious illness has now developed in one of the subjects during testing of a proposed vaccine from aborted fetuses (out of England, where the now infamous estimate of two million deaths was first promulgated). So the roll-out is being slowed down. But the vaccine is still on order? WHY?

A few people who had COVID-19 earlier this year reportedly have been re-infected. A reasonable question to ask is WHY? Shouldn’t they have had immunity? If not, WHY expect immunity to come from a vaccine? And if it can’t, they WHY vaccinate?

Much has been made of the thrust (apparently from the Gateses among others) to couple a vaccine with a mark on the forehead or right hand, without which a person would be barred from participation in a variety of activities needed to live in a free society, a demand made by some of the doctors involved. The mark sounds exactly like what the Book of Revelation describes as the mark of the beast.

• WHY is there no commentary being made to the effect that anyone who already has had COVID-19 doesn’t need to get the vaccine?  Would they be given the mark without vaccination? Required to take the mark? Would they still be vaccinated even though they should be immune? Is it because there really is no immunization? WHY?
• WHY has nothing been said about the expected expiration of immunity from the vaccine and how that would affect the mark? WHY would the mark continue when immunity is past?
• WHY do we know nothing about removal, modification or re-administration of the mark to track changes in immunity with performance changes in the vaccine? WHY is there such insistence to ignore use of non-abortive materials in the vaccine?
• WHY is so much emphasis being placed on a vaccine for prevention, when it isn’t even a treatment for those who get infected, neglecting the obvious successful use in treatment of an anti-malarial (which doesn’t need injection or a mark of the beast).

WHY? WHY? WHY is the question.

Consider that it may not be about a vaccine at all. Consider the possibility that there may be no need to vaccinate because there may be only a short immunity, if at all, just like other ‘flu shots.’ Consider the possibility that it isn’t about COVID protection at all, but that it is a COVER story to get the mark of the beast into a worldwide population, and the doctors involved have tipped their hands, because the evil one always needs to brag. That is one way to recognize who is tipping the scales. Consider the possibility that a mandatory vaccination is all about domination, incapacitation and population reduction short of war, leaving the physical assets in place. Consider that what may be administered as a ‘vaccine’ may already be in use, manipulating crowds, suppressing inhibition, and promoting hatred and division especially toward religion. Consider too that the lock-down at this period in time may simply be to keep good people from interfering with the unrolling of an evil strategy, especially such prolonged locking down of the churches.

Or not?