Cleansing Fire

Defending Truth and Tradition in the Roman Catholic Church

Author Archive

The moral authority of professional Catholics

February 16th, 2012, Promulgated by Mike

Over the last several years I have noticed increasing numbers of a certain kind of professional Catholic. These are people engaged in Catholic media in a wide variety of formats and specializing in a broad range of subject areas. They all, however, share one thing in common: Each has pretty much spent his or her  career studiously avoiding one particular, serious problem within the American branch of the Catholic Church.  This problem is not abortion.  It is not the shameful rate of divorce among Catholics. It is not even the push for same-sex “marriage,” so called.

No, the problem these people with the EWTN television shows, the radio microphones and the book publishing contracts all treat like a third rail is the scandal of American bishops who have betrayed the Church and have effectively left their flocks to wander in the wilderness. And it is not just those bishops who have done so in the past, but those who continue to do so today.

I was reminded of this situation this morning while listening to Teresa Tomeo’s Catholic Connection show on Ave Maria Radio.  The subject was the Obama administration’s recent health care mandate and what our reaction as faithful, lay Catholics ought to be.  Early on in the show Teresa offered the following, obviously unscripted comments on that topic (my transcription from the podcast beginning at the 10:55 mark) …

This is our time to stand up and back up the bishops and be their foot soldiers and engage the culture in a loving way. I can’t stress this enough. And, again, as I said yesterday on my show when I had a long talk with Al Kresta and Nick Thomm about this, I’m hearing, still, a lot of angst with people saying, you know, it’s the bishops’ fault we’re in this mess in the first place, yadda, yadda, yadda, because of the lack of teaching over the years.

If you have that frustration, again I’m going to caution you greatly, that that is very damaging and that is also what the devil wants.  We are under such grave attack right now from the culture, from our own administration, and now we’re going to attack each other and eat our young?

You know, Al and I have certainly not been shy in mentioning when we think there’s  issues, when there’s lack of teaching.  EWTN is not shy about that.  Mother Angelica began this network because she saw what was happening in this country, that she needed to re-catechize a country and prevent it from falling over into the deep end completely.

We are here to evangelize but we are also here to catechize and to re-catechize and it does no one any good to spew any anger or frustration we have toward what has happened in the past.

Now, do we learn from our mistakes? Absolutely. Do we do things differently and better? Absolutely. But now is not the time to sit there and say, “He should have done that, he should have done this, he needs to do this.” What are you doing to help the bishops who are doing a great job right now?  And the sad thing is the bishops who are running this right now are not even the ones who caused the problems in the first place: the Bakers, the Chaputs, the Vignerons, the Cordileones, the Carltons.  I mean, we have amazing leadership right now. And if you allow yourself to get caught up in anger and frustration about something that’s hap…  I’m not saying that we deny that we, all of us, have done a poor job in the past.  But I just really want to encourage you to stand up for the truth and back the Church right now. And if you’re upset then go and kick a garbage can, scream into a pillow, but tell your bishop you will support these efforts to stop what is happening.  Because I’ll tell you right now, if this mandate continues and if this is allowed to stand, we’re not going to be able to teach about anything.  Who knows what they’re going to try to do to EWTN. Who knows what they’re going to try to do in the churches.

So we need to stop the infighting and we need to love our bishops and to love our Church.  We are all imperfect. The only two people who ever existed, Jesus, being fully God and fully man, and Our Lady.  We all have planks in our eye that we can pull out.  And this is not minimizing anything that has happened in Church history.  But the infighting is not going to help us, it’s only going to hurt us and it’s what the devil wants: Divide and conquer.

Halfway through this commentary I emailed the following to Ave Maria Radio…

We have amazing leadership right now?

While that may be the case in some dioceses, it is far from a universal truth.

You don’t live in upstate New York, do you?  Have you ever heard  of Matthew Clark or Howard Hubbard?

I wish you and the majority of the “professional Catholics” out there would get your collective heads out of the sand and take a good look at what is going on in some dioceses in this country, not in the past, but RIGHT NOW!

We are living in a wilderness here and most of you people with the microphones and the publishing contracts couldn’t care less, as is evident from your collective lack of attention to our plight.

Sorry, Teresa, but some of our bishops are currently doing Satan’s work and I and my friends refuse to be silent about it, no matter how much you would like us to have a united front.  We have consciences, too.

Needlessto say, I was a bit surprised when Teresa mentioned my note on the air (my transcription, same podcast, beginning at the 44:24 mark) …

I just received an email from a Mike. I don’t want to say where he’s from because I don’t know if what he’s saying about his bishops are true and I would want to give, with all due respect to the hierarchy, them a chance to explain, but he’s saying that we have our heads in the sand and that we think everything is wonderful – I’m paraphrasing here – wonderful and hunky-dory because there are a lot of bishops who aren’t doing anything and my response, and I’m writing him back right now, is, what’s the point of this, how is your whining going to help anyone. If your bishops aren’t doing anything, do something yourself.  Sitting there complaining is only going to make matters worse. What have you done and what are you willing to do?

That was some paraphrase. How she got that out of my email escapes me. I said nothing about the response of area bishops to the Obama mandate, but that’s what she chose to read into it. Very telling, however, is that my assertion that some “bishops are currently doing Satan’s work” seemed totally invisible to her. And this is not the first time that Teresa has ignored negative comments about sitting bishops.  Within the past year I have heard her effectively cut off two callers who had critical things to say, and I only catch her show once or twice a week.

So now I am faced with this question: Should I listen to someone who has, over the years, willfully or otherwise, turned a professional blind eye to much of the episcopal misfeasance and malfeasance that is largely responsible for the mess we face today?  Should I stop my “whining” about ongoing heterodoxy and heteropraxis for what she believes to be the greater good? Does her record in this area give her the credibility, the moral authority, to even make that request?

If it were someone like Michael Voris asking, I’d have to give it serious thought.

Teresa Tomeo?  I think not.

 

Bruskewitz on Sebelius: “a bitter fallen-away Catholic”

January 28th, 2012, Promulgated by Mike

From Omaha.com, the web site of the Omaha World-Herald …

LINCOLN — Bishop Fabian Bruskewitz has issued a blistering letter calling on Roman Catholics in the Lincoln Diocese to fight a federal decision requiring all employers to provide health insurance that pays for birth control, female sterilization procedures and “the morning after” pill.

U.S. bishops had asked for an exemption from the rule for employers such as Catholic hospitals and social services agencies. That request was denied this month by Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, a Catholic.

“The present secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, a bitter fallen-away Catholic, now requires that all insurance, even when issued privately, must carry coverage for evil and grave sin,” Bruskewitz wrote in the letter, which he instructed parish priests to read aloud to their congregations at Mass this weekend.

Sebelius is among a number of Catholic politicians in the United States who have been banned from receiving Holy Communion because of their positions on abortion.

She was banned by Archbishop Joseph Naumann of Kansas City, Kan., because, as Kansas governor, she vetoed strict anti-abortion legislation that her advisers told her was unconstitutional.

In his letter, Bruskewitz said he was happy to join the effort to “protest most strongly against a mandate, not even a duly passed law, issued by the Obama administration that requires all Catholics in the United States to violate their consciences and support abortion, abortion-causing drugs, contraception and sterilization.”

The morning-after pill often is described as “emergency contraception” that will prevent conception after unplanned sex or birth control failures. Many opponents of abortion rights, however, view it as a form of abortion because if an egg is already fertilized, the pill would prevent it from developing in the uterus.

Although Sebelius has given religious-affiliated organizations a year to comply with the rule, Bruskewitz called that an “act of mockery” because during that year, employees must be referred “to the insurance that covers wicked deeds.”

“We cannot and will not comply with this unjust decree,” he said. “Like the martyrs of old, we must be prepared to accept suffering which could include heavy fines and imprisonment. Our American religious liberty is in grave jeopardy.”

The full text of His Excellency’s letter has yet to be made available online.

UPDATE (January 31): Bishop Bruskewitz’ letter is now online. See here.

Bishop Bruskewitz on the Diocese of Lincoln

January 27th, 2012, Promulgated by Mike

In another 8 weeks Fabian Bruskewitz will celebrate the 20th anniversary of his appointment as Bishop of the Diocese of Lincoln.  With that milestone rapidly approaching, His Excellency recently gave an interview to Jim Graves of the National Catholic Register.

Tell me about the Diocese of Lincoln.

It is a stable and wonderful diocese. Much of it is made up of small towns and rural areas, although Lincoln is the state capital and has a mix of businesses and the University of Nebraska.

Thank God, we have no diocesan debts, nor have we had problems with lawsuits with which other dioceses have struggled. We have a splendid clergy, and our religious life is flourishing.  We have had many vocations, more than is adequate for a diocese of our size. In the last 20 years, I’ve ordained 67 priests for Lincoln and another 20 or 30 for other dioceses or religious orders.

We have 38 seminarians studying for the priesthood. I’ve had the joy of constructing St. Gregory the Great Seminary, a college seminary, which opened 12 years ago. It instructs not only our students, but those from six other dioceses.

I invited and was pleased to welcome the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter, a community of apostolic life dedicated to preserving the memory and practice of the extraordinary form of the Roman rite. Our diocese is home to the Fraternity’s Our Lady of Guadalupe Seminary. They have more young men applying to be seminarians than there is space available for them.

I also invited and was pleased to welcome a community of cloistered Carmelite sisters who pray for us constantly. We also have the Holy Spirit Adoration Sisters who pray constantly before Our Lord in the Blessed Sacrament. The sisters’ prayers have brought us many spiritual blessings.

We have a well-educated and zealous laity, and I’ve had the pleasure to form five new parishes and four new schools to serve them.

Our little diocese on the plains is doing well.

While there is much more here, there are a few topics that did not get covered in the interview. For instance,

  • According to the 2011 Official Catholic Directory, the Diocese of Lincoln has 133 parishes, every one of which is under the direct control of a priest. (83 parishes are led by on-site pastors while the remaining 50 are administered by priests.)
  • The same source reports that the diocese has precisely 2 lay ministers.
  • “Bishop Bruskewitz fully expects that the priests of the Diocese of Lincoln faithfully follow the rubrics and words of the Roman Missal and does not tolerate liturgical ‘creativity'” (source here).
  • Diocesan weekend Mass attendance was last reported to be 60%.

Bishop Bruskewitz turned 75 in September of 2010. In doesn’t appear that Pope Benedict is in any hurry to name a successor.

Fr. Baron on “Why I Hate Religion” video

January 24th, 2012, Promulgated by Mike

Dovetailing a bit on Ben’s post, I saw this morning that Fr. Robert Baron has responded to Jefferson Bethke’s “Why I Hate Religion” video.

%CODE1%

There is also a second video from Fr. Baron but, before clicking on the play button, you should be aware – if you aren’t already – that ‘deracinate’ means ‘to pull up by the roots’ or ‘to isolate or alienate something from its native or customary culture or environment.’ Why you should know this will soon become obvious.

%CODE2%

 

An ecumenucal gesture

January 10th, 2012, Promulgated by Mike

On January 2 Rev. Marvin McMickle officially took up the presidential reins at Colgate Rochester Crozer Divinity School.

Rev. McMickle comes to Rochester from Cleveland where he spent the last two dozen years as pastor of Antioch Baptist Church,

… one of the city’s largest and most prestigious black churches. Three times, Martin Luther King Jr. preached there. Presidents and would-be presidents have campaigned there.

McMickle, who has spent his ministry in the vanguard of social-justice movements, said he’s looking forward to life in Rochester, home of two notable 19th century civil rights activists — suffragist Susan B. Anthony and abolitionist Frederick Douglass.

Rev. McMickle was chosen to be the new CRCDS President in May of last year and, since July,

… has been going back and forth from Cleveland to Rochester.

He has been spending one week each month at the seminary, meeting with school administrators, faculty and trustees. He’s also been meeting with the heads of the Rochester area’s various denominations.

Given the site of his upcoming inauguration, one of these meetings appears to have been with Bishop Matthew Clark:

Though he starts his job in January, his official inauguration to the post won’t be until next fall, the start of the new school year.

The event will be held at Sacred Heart Cathedral, the mother church of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Rochester.

“We’re trying to make an ecumenical gesture,” McMickle said.

No problem!  Here in DOR we may not have yet figured out how to be Catholic, but we certainly know how to be ecumenical.

 

Sources here, here, and here.

“Do you know God?”

December 23rd, 2011, Promulgated by Mike

Last Memorial Day weekend Father John Riccardo of the Archdiocese of Detroit was invited to address the congregation of Kensington Church, a large, non-denominational, Protestant “seeker” church located in Troy, Michigan.

With some concern that it might be a bit over their heads, I showed this talk to my 7th and 8th grade religious ed kids a couple of months ago.  As it turned out I needn’t have worried.  I was impressed by both their level of attention and how much they got out of it.

Father Riccardo is introduced by Kensington’s Senior Pastor, Steven Andrews.

%CODE1%

Long lines for Confession at BK

December 20th, 2011, Promulgated by Mike

A reader with children attending Bishop Kearney Junior/Senior High School reports that the school offered a Communal Penance service last week, followed by individual confession with a priest.

Students, of course, were not required to celebrate the sacrament, yet a large number chose to do so.  It took more than two hours for all to be heard.

The Faith would appear to be alive and well at BK.

HT/ CathMom

King of Kings and Lord of Lords

December 19th, 2011, Promulgated by Mike

The Holy Cross Church Choir presented a concert of Lessons and Carols yesterday afternoon.  This clip is from the finale …

%CODE1%

 At the reception which followed one woman was heard to quip, “That concert was so good I thought for a moment I was in a Protestant church.”

“Catholics Come Home” going prime time

November 2nd, 2011, Promulgated by Mike

Don’t you wish the Church had a response to all those “… and I’m a Mormon” ads running on national television? I know I do. And so does Tom Peterson.

Peterson, founder of Catholics Come Home, was a guest on Teresa Tomeo’s radio show this morning where he made the following announcement (my transcription):

For the first time ever Catholic evangelization ads are going to be airing on national, network, prime-time television. Over 400 ads on CBS, NBC, Fox News, CNN, USA, TBS, TNT, on 60 Minutes, the Today Show, on Jay Leno, on Letterman, on the NBC Evening News, on all the popular shows, from December 16 to January 8.

In other words, we’re finally going to have Catholic ads on national network TV reaching 250 million television viewers in over 10,000 cities in every diocese across the United States.

Later in the day the same news appeared on the organization’s web site …

FIRST TIME EVER…
CATHOLIC EVANGELIZATION ADS
ON NATIONAL, PRIME-TIME NETWORK TELEVISION!
CATHOLICS COME HOME® COMMERCIALS AIRING NATIONWIDE

Atlanta (Roswell), GA, November 2, 2011—Catholics Come Home® announces a major, national, prime-time network television evangelization initiative, for the first time ever in the 2,000 year history of the Catholic Church, to air from December 16, 2011 through January 8, 2012.

This invitation of the New Evangelization highlights the history, beauty, spirituality and accomplishments of the Catholic Church.  The positive message will reach 250 million television viewers in over 10,000 U.S. cities and every diocese throughout the United States, airing over 400 times during the three week period spanning before Christmas through the Feast of the Epiphany, January 8, 2012.

More information here.

Focus fail?

October 20th, 2011, Promulgated by Mike

The University of Dayton will host a conference next month exploring the role of the laity in the Church. Empowered by Baptism: The Mission of the Laity Today will focus on how the laity “continues to energize the Catholic faith.”

“For the church to be strong today, we need lay people to step up and be involved,” said the Rev. James Fitz, S.M., vice president for mission and rector of the University. “The church can take its mission out into the world only if lay people feel that vocation and take that mission into neighborhoods, workplaces and all parts of society.”

Bishop Matthew Clark, Bishop of Rochester, N.Y., and author of Forward in Hope: Saying AMEN to Lay Ecclesial Ministry, will deliver a keynote address at 10 a.m. on “The Challenge of the Contemporary Lay Vocation.”

Clark, who has served as Rochester’s bishop for 32 years, has actively supported and promoted increasing the number of lay ministers as well as expanding the roles of lay people in the church.

One wonders whether Fr. Fitz and the conference organizers are aware that weekend Mass attendance in the Diocese of Rochester has dropped by more than 1/3 in just the last 10 years, despite modest growth in our overall population (story here). At first blush this would seem to be the polar opposite of the energized Catholic faith of which the UoD article speaks.

Could it be that Bishop Clark’s incessant focus on lay ministry has come at the expense of what should have been his primary concern, the spiritual well-being of his flock?

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

BTW, Rich Leonardi wrote about Bishop Clark’s appearance at this conference here. The comments are worth perusing (and not just because a couple of them are mine).

Note to RCIA leaders

October 6th, 2011, Promulgated by Mike

Peter Kreeft has posted his conversion story at The Integrated Catholic Life.  While the entire essay is well worth your time, the last paragraph should be required reading for anyone involved in evangelism, catechesis and/or RCIA (my emphasis):

I have been happy as a Catholic for many years now. The honeymoon faded, of course, but the marriage has deepened. Like all converts I ever have heard of, I was hauled aboard not by those Catholics who try to “sell” the church by conforming it to the spirit of the times by saying Catholics are just like everyone else, but by those who joyfully held out the ancient and orthodox faith in all its fullness and prophetic challenge to the world. The minimalists, who reduce miracles to myths, dogmas to opinions, laws to values, and the Body of Christ to a psycho-social club, have always elicited wrath, pity, or boredom from me. So has political partisanship masquerading as religion. I am happy as a child to follow Christ’s vicar on earth everywhere he leads. What he loves, I love; what he leaves, I leave; where he leads, I follow. For the Lord we both adore said to Peter his predecessor, “Who hears you, hears Me.” That is why I am a Catholic: because I am a Christian. 

Full essay here.


Hitting close to home

October 5th, 2011, Promulgated by Mike
In conjunction with the Occupy Wall Street movement, a group of people who consider themselves economic outcasts have begun to post their stories at We Are The 99 Percent:
We are the 99 percent. We are getting kicked out of our homes. We are forced to choose between groceries and rent. We are denied quality medical care. We are suffering from environmental pollution. We are working long hours for little pay and no rights, if we’re working at all. We are getting nothing while the other 1 percent is getting everything. We are the 99 percent.

So far there are over 700 stories on line.

One of these stories comes from a former DOR Catholic Schools employee …

I was an art teacher in the Diocese of Rochester for 24 years. The pay has always been below poverty level. I’ve worked three – four jobs for years trying to make ends meet. One of my other jobs was to design and build sets for community theater.

Last March & April I received a critical spinal injury, and needed emergency surgery. Because I was a temp., the district had no legal obligation to assist in my expenses. I was hospitalized for 4 weeks. While I was strapped to my bed, my primary employer, The Diocese of Rochester, revoked each of my saved up sick days (over 60 in total). They also demoted me from permanent part-time to hourly. Finally, they refused to relinquish the salary I had set aside for our summer living expenses.

I was assured at the time of my surgery that I would have a job to return to. That was a lie. My principal replaced me with a volunteer.

Our family has suffered greatly from my loss of employment and equally the high cost of medical care. My retirement fund, after 24 years, has less than $2,000 in it. My savings account is empty. I am denied disability benefits because I was part-time. We’ve gone weeks without utilities that include; Gas, Electric, Phone, & Cable. I had to end my physical therapy weeks early because of the high costs per treatment.  Our home is in foreclosure. I can no longer do physical work, and I cannot collect unemployment or disability benefits.

Our oldest son cannot afford to return for college. Our youngest son will go without a birthday party and likely Christmas this year. Both of our cars are broken down wrecks. We rely on them, but cannot afford repairs or legal tires.

We need money to live on. I risk re-injuring my spine and potentially dying or spending my life in a wheelchair if I return to a job now. If I do not find a job to return to, we risk losing what little we have remaining.

I am part of the 99%

Source here.

UPDATE: A large part of this family’s problems would seem to stem from an action taken by the DOR School System in 2009 …

In January, some employees of the diocesan school system received a letter informing them that as of June, ‘09, they would no longer be eligible for health and dental benefits under the auspices of the diocese. The new policy affects all employees who work less than 35 hours a week. This diocesan action primarily impacted employees at the lower end of the economic spectrum who are least able to cope with an increase in medical costs. The employees were told that this action would save the diocese about $300,000 a year. (Source here.)

 

Red Mass

October 1st, 2011, Promulgated by Mike

The Democrat & Chronicle is reporting that the annual Red Mass was held yesterday at Sacred Heart Cathedral with Bishop Matthew Clark presiding.

The Red Mass was at one time sponsored by the St. Thomas More Lawyers Guild and was held at Our Lady of Victory/St. Joseph Church, thus making attendance convenient for the police officers, judges, court employees and large number of lawyers who work in the downtown area.

Following the completion of “renovations” in 2007 the Red Mass was moved several miles out of the downtown area to Sacred Heart Cathedral, with attendance reported to have fallen off sharply. A YNN video clip of yesterday’s liturgy shows perhaps 3 dozen people present:

The formal involvement of the Guild also seems to have ended with the transfer of the Red Mass to the cathedral (see here). Indeed, the Guild currently makes no mention of the Red Mass in its online listing of upcoming events.

The Guild writes that it

… was founded in 1975 and one of its purposes is to provide a forum whereby the Catholic position on moral and legal issues may be presented to counter the pervading secular humanism.  Of primary concern is fidelity to the teachings of the Pope and the Magisterium.  The Guild is supportive of the protection of all human life (source here).

Given that commitment to the Pope and the Magisterium it would be surprising if the Guild had not locked horns with Bishop Clark at some time during his 32+ years tenure as the Bishop of Rochester. That event occurred in 1997 and resulted in the Bishop reportedly accusing the Guild of “undermining his authority” and telling them “that henceforth they cannot hold meetings or disseminate literature without his permission.” That story is available here.

“All the News That Fits Our Editorial Agenda”

September 28th, 2011, Promulgated by Mike

The last time I picked up a print copy of the New York Times I noted that their motto, “All the News That’s Fit to Print”, was still proudly displayed in the upper-left corner of the front page.

I mention this because of a story that went up early yesterday afternoon on the Catholic News Agency’s web site.  The story details the economic gain achieved by Madrid and the surrounding area due to August’s World Youth Day celebration:

Madrid, Spain, Sep 27, 2011 / 01:30 pm (CNA).- The Spanish capital city of Madrid came away with over $200 million in profits after World Youth Day 2011 held this past August, officials said.

The WYD Madrid press office reported Sept. 26 that the Confederation of Businessmen of Madrid calculated that the capital took in some $216 million during the visit of Pope Benedict XVI.

In August the Gray Lady published a decidedly negative piece on WYD expenses that led with the news that 120 Spanish clergy working with the poor had signed a petition deploring the cost of the event.

Now that WYD has been shown to have been an economic boon for the entire area one wonders if the USA’s “newspaper of record” will take note of that fact.  So far there’s nothing about this on nytimes.com and, given the paper’s recent anti-Catholic slant, I’m not holding my breath waiting for something to appear.

It only remains for the New York Times to come clean with its readers by coming up with a new motto that more accurately reflects its liberal and, especially, its anti-Catholic bias.

Might I suggest “All the News That Fits Our Editorial Agenda”?

Sr. Joan Sobala – The early years

September 22nd, 2011, Promulgated by Mike

Gen’s recent post on the upcoming retirement of Sr. Joan Sobala drew some interesting comments, one of which mentioned her participation in a teach-in at St. Bernard’s protesting the promulgation of Ordinatio Sacerdotalis.

It should be noted that Sr. Joan’s “problems” with Church teaching predated that 1994 St. Bernard’s event by at least 14 years and have not been limited to the ordination of women to the priesthood.

In his 1982 book, The Homosexual Network – Private Lives and Public Policy, Fr. Enrique Rueda detailed some of the collaboration then occurring between Catholic groups and elements of the homosexual movement. One of these Catholic groups was the Women’s Ordination Conference, represented by Sr. Joan Sobala.

Fr. Rueda writes …

Another indication of the pattern of collaboration between significant elements within the Catholic Church and the homosexual movement is the availability of prohomosexual materials at Catholic meetings. This is not a matter of individuals standing in doorways or on sidewalks handing out leaflets, but the fully accepted presence of representatives of the homosexual movement by Catholic agencies and national organizations. For example, during the March 1982 East Coast Conference on Religious Education in Washington, D.C. prohomosexual material was available at an official New Ways Ministry Booth.127 Homosexual booths were also installed at the National Catholic Charities 66th Annual Convention and at the 10th biennial meeting of the Association of Ladies of Charity of the United States. Dignity could boast that some “1600 Bishops, priests, nuns and laity from the U.S.” had been reached at these events.128 The value of being officially admitted to these functions comes not only from the resultant ability to influence the leadership of the Catholic Church, but from the fact that from a political point of view, this is equated with acceptance of the principle “gay is good,” in practice if not in theory.

At times, even the bishops’ conferences become the occasion for networking. As noted, the homosexual movement is closely related — ideologically and organizationally — with feminism. This relationship is then carried over to the Catholic Church. During the 1980 meeting of bishops in Washington, D.C., this relationship was cemented at a meeting which included Father Robert Nugent, SDS, and Sister Jeannine Gramick, SSND, for the homosexual movement and the leadership the Women’s Ordination Conference (WOC, a radical Catholic feminist organization). WOC was represented by, among others, Sister Joan Sobala, SSJ,. a “chaplain” at the University of Rochester. The purpose of the meeting was “to explore ways of collaboration and to obtain support from WOC for the Catholic Coalition for Gay Civil Rights. “129 At this meeting, the homosexual movement was able to gain specific commitments from the WOC: “WOC will publish articles on homosexuality and will also offer New Ways printed resources to their readers.”130 There is evidence that WOC has indeed lived up to its commitment to the homosexuals: the January 1982 issue of New Women New Church, the publication of WOC, included an article by a female homosexual on the “Feminist Theological Perspectives of Lesbian and Gay Male Experience.”131 The same issue also published a very favorable report about the homosexual symposium sponsored by New Ways Ministry.132 This should not be surprising, since the WOC sent a homosexual as a representative to the symposium who was also one of the speakers.

The evidence that there is a strong relationship between the movement to ordain women to the Catholic priesthood and the homosexual movement is obvious from the overlap between the Catholic homosexual network (the Catholic Coalition for Gay Civil Rights, of which more will be said later) and WOC. A comparison between the membership in WOC as of September 1977 and the current membership in the Catholic homosexual network reveals that fifteen percent of the members of WOC are also members of the homosexual organization. (Our analysis included a sample of members of WOC in eight States and the District of Columbia.)

Twenty-seven percent of the individuals whose names appeared in the Proceedings of the Second Conference on the Ordination of Roman Catholic Women which took place on November 1978 are also members of the Catholic homosexual network.

The leadership of the Women’s ordination movement is closely connected with the homosexual movement. Thirty-three percent of the membership of the task force charged with organizing the 1978 conference of WOC are members of the Catholic homosexual network. The proportions for the WOC Advisory Board and the WOC Core Commission for 1979-1980 are even higher (fifty-seven and sixty-seven percent respectively.)133 It is obvious that in terms of number of participants, increasing involvement in WOC correlates strongly with increasing involvement in the Catholic homosexual network.

It is difficult to imagine a logical relationship between the desire to engage in sexual intercourse with persons of one’s own sex—for either males or females—and the question of the acceptance of females as part of the Roman Catholic clergy, unless all should be linked under the umbrella of “social justice.” This could hardly be the case, however, since consistency would demand that practically every other issue be included as a suitable subject for adoption by both WOC and the Catholic homosexual movement acting in unison. Of course, as a matter of fact, this is not the case.

The relations between WOC and New Ways Ministry are obviously not a matter of a one-shot deal. This is clear from the following item, which appeared in a New Ways Ministry publication: “New Ways sent letters of congratulations to the new WOC Core Commission members and had a short visit at the New Ways house from Sr. Barbara Ferraro, a member of WOC Core Commission.”134

What we have presented is merely a sampling of the many instances of cooperation between Roman Catholic institutions and leaders and the homosexual movement. Obviously, neither most Catholics nor most Catholic institutions would dream of becoming tools of the homosexual movement. However, the emergence of a pattern of collaboration between certain circles within the Church and the homosexual movement is unquestionable. The question, from the point of view of traditional Catholicism, is whether the Catholic Church will be strong enough to resist the attempts of a movement alien to its ideology and interests to utilize this ancient and venerable institution for its own political purposes.

Footnotes Cited Above:

127Bondings, Spring-Summer 1981, p. 1.
128Dignity 12 (Washington, D.C.: Dignity, Inc., January 1981): 1.
129Bondings, Winter 1980-81, p. 3.
130
Ibid.
131
Barbara Zanotti, “Feminist Theological Perspectives on Lesbian and Gay Male Experience,” New Women/New Church 5 (Rochester: Women’s Ordination Conference, January 1982): 6.
132 Barbara Zanotti, “Traversing New Ground,” New Women/New Church 5 (Rochester N. Y.: Women’s Ordination Conference, January 1982): 6.
133
Base data taken from Maureen Dwyer, New Women/New Church/New Priestly Ministry, Proceedings of the Second Conference on the Ordination of Roman Catholic Women, Rochester, especially pp. 173, 174, and 175.
134Bondings, Winter 1980-81, p. 3.
135America, June 25, 1977, p. 558.

__________________________

Bondings is the newsletter of New Ways Ministry

New Women, New Church is the newsletter of the Women’s Ordination Conference

[Text from pages 330-332 of Fr. Rueda’s book, with the footnotes appearing on page 379.]

Sr. Joan was not just some rank-and-file WOC member who happened to show up at that 1980 meeting of the Bishops’ Conference. She is, rather, one of “the very women who first envsioned … the first Women’s Ordination Conference” and “served on the WOC staff from 1979-1982.” It therefore seems more than likely that she played a role in deciding that the WOC would participate, along with representatives of 15 other mainline churches, in the 3-day, May 1979 Strategy Conference on Homophobia in the Church.  Concerning this conference Fr Rueda writes,

It is important to realize that this meeting was not an intellectual exercise, but that it had three clearly political and action-oriented objectives: 1) to raise the consciousness of the participants and those represented by the participants in various aspects of the homosexual ideology; 2) to form and cement the homosexual religious network; and 3) to develop and begin implementing an action plan to use the churches for the advancement of the movement’s objectives.

[Text from pages 277-278 of Fr. Rueda’s book.]

Given this history of dissent, the departure of Sr. Joan from active ministry in the Catholic Church is long overdue.

Rosary for Vocations

September 15th, 2011, Promulgated by Mike

My video from Tuesday evening’s Rosary for Vocations held at St. John Fisher College:

%CODE1%

My observations: The sacred music selections (see below) were awesome, the choir’s rendition of same was superb and Deacon Tom Jewell’s homily, which begins at the 4:02 mark, was excellent.

Opening Hymn: The Royal Banners Forward Go
Sermon: by Dcn. Tom Jewell – “Nothing is Sacred Anymore”
Procession to the tabernacle: Christus Factus Est (Gradual for Holy Thursday)
Exposition: O Salutaris Hostia
Rosary: Salve Regina (chant)
Adoration: Jesu Dulcis Memoria (chant) with Jesu Rex Admirabilis (Palestrina polyphony) interspersed
Benediction: Tantum Ergo (chant, Pange Lingua melody)
Reposition: Adoremus in Aeternum (chant)
Recessional Hymn: Rejoice the Lord is King

Abp. Chaput: “they’re not really Catholic”

September 10th, 2011, Promulgated by Mike

PHILADELPHIA (AP) — Incoming Philadelphia Archbishop Charles Chaput doesn’t want the Roman Catholic church to lose members.

But he says it’s not the place for so-called “cafeteria Catholics” who don’t accept all of its teachings.

Chaput has condemned the University of Notre Dame for bestowing an award on President Obama, who supports abortion rights, and thinks Catholic politicians with the same beliefs should not take Holy Communion.

“If they don’t believe what the church teaches, they’re not really Catholic,” Chaput told The Associated Press in an interview Tuesday, two days before his installation at the Cathedral Basilica of Saints Peter and Paul.

While His Excellency is speaking of Catholic politicians, there is really nothing that would distinguish them from other cafeteria Catholics.  Willful rejection of Church teaching destroys one’s communion with the Church, regardless of whether one is or is not a public figure.

Full story here.

We’re doing something wrong

September 3rd, 2011, Promulgated by Mike

I tell my relatives and best friends, “If you want your children to fight for their faith, send them to public school. If you want them to lose their faith, send them to Catholic school.”*

A two-year, $1 M study of “nearly 2,500 American high school graduates between the ages of 24-39” was recently conducted by Cardus (a Canadian group that describes itself as “a think tank dedicated to the renewal of North American social architecture”) in partnership with the University of Notre Dame.  The study examined “43 different categories of academic, spiritual and civic life,” with graduates of public, Catholic, private (both religious and secular) and home-school programs being surveyed.  The results were published last week.

So how did Catholic high school graduates fare, compared to all their counterparts?  Well, if secular measures are important to you, the answer would be “Pretty well.”  But if you are a parent (or grandparent) who believes he is paying for a solid Catholic education, “Buyer beware!” might be a more appropriate answer.

For instance, the study determined that, compared to their public high school counterparts, Catholic high graduates were  “less likely to believe in moral absolutes, to respect the authority of the Catholic Church, to believe in the infallibly of Scripture or to condemn premarital sex.”

A story on the survey goes on to report,

“In many cases, the difference in outcomes between Catholic and Protestant Christian schools is striking,” the study states. “Catholic schools provide superior academic outcomes, an experience that translates into graduates’ enrollment in more prestigious colleges and universities, more advanced degrees and higher household income.

“At the same time, however, our research finds that the moral, social and religious dispositions of Catholic school graduates seem to run counter to the values and teachings of the Catholic church,” the study concludes. “For example, students graduating from Catholic schools divorce no less than their public school counterparts, and significantly more than their Protestant Christian and non-religious private school peers. Similarly, having attended Catholic school has no impact on the frequency with which those graduates will attend church services, and Catholic school graduates are less likely to serve as leaders in their churches.”

The study also found, “On every measure of traditional religious beliefs, Protestant Christian school graduates show significantly more adherence to the church teachings than their peers, findings that hold up after rigorous controls, indicating the impact of the Protestant Christian school on the long-term religious beliefs of their graduates.”

The authors of the study concluded, “Protestant Christian schools play a vital role in the long-term faith of their students, while Catholic schools seem to be largely irrelevant, sometimes even counterproductive to the development of their students’ faith.”

Other results of interest to Catholic parents include the following:

  • The net effect of Protestant and religious home education was an increase in graduates’ reported attendance at religious services, while Catholic and non-religious private school grads reported a decrease in attendance.
  • Protestant and religious home educated graduates showed a net increase in belief in the Bible as an infallible guide for personal life and behavior, that premarital sex is wrong and that divorce is wrong, while Catholic and non-religious private schooling showed a net decrease in these beliefs.
  • Catholic schools – whose administrators also reported to Cardus a higher emphasis than their Protestant peers on academic achievement – produced more graduates attending top 20 universities and significantly more attending Carnegie Research I and II universities.

The Cardus team again summarized their findings: “This research finds that Catholic schools are providing higher quality intellectual development, at the expense of developing students’ faith and commitment to religious practices. Protestant Christian schools, conversely, are providing a place where students become distinct in their commitment to faith, but are not advancing to higher education any more than their public school peers. Graduates of Catholic schools and non-religious private schools show a significant advantage in years of education, while Protestant Christian school graduates have statistically identical attainment levels as their public school peers. Additionally, graduates of Protestant Christian schools attend less competitive colleges than both their Catholic and non-religious private school peers.”

The researchers suggested the differences between Catholic and Protestant schools may be directly tied to the institutions’ priorities, as measured by an included survey of over 150 private school administrators in the U.S. and Canada.

“These outcomes closely reflect the values reported by school administrators,” the study concludes. “While Catholic school administrators rank university as the top priority more than any other option, more Protestant Christian school administrators rank family as the top emphasis of the school.”

Full story here.

Cardus report here.

——————–

*This quote is widely attributed to Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen (see here, for example), although I have been unable to determine from which of His Excellency’s many books, homilies, TV shows, speeches, etc. it comes.

Church teaching: Personal views and opinions?

September 2nd, 2011, Promulgated by Mike

In 2009 the El Paso, Texas City Council voted to offer the same benefits available to married employees to those who were in “domestic partnerships,” including gay couples. The new law went into effect early in 2010 and the domestic partners of several gay employees were added to the list of those receiving city benefits.  This action stirred up a grass-roots effort that was successful in placing a referendum on the November 2010 ballot. By a 55-45 margin the citizens of El Paso voted to limit benefits to city employees and their legal spouses, thus overturning the action of their City Council.

Recent votes taken by the City Council have been seen by some as an end-around maneuver designed to maintain benefits for the domestic partners added to the rolls in 2010, thus thwarting the clear will of the electorate. As a result, the mayor and two city councilmen are now facing recall elections in the next two weeks.

All of this is background to a series of 4 paid advertisements that recently ran in the El Paso Times.  The author is Fr. Michael Rodriguez, a Diocese of El Paso parish priest, and the ads were placed and paid for by anonymous donors.  The ads are reproduced below.

It is interesting to note that each of the ads bears a disclaimer put there by the newspaper:

The views expressed by this advertisement do not reflect the views of the El Paso Times or any of its affiliates.

Disclaimers of this sort usually read “do not necessarily reflect”, instead of “do not reflect”.  Thus it appears that the Times wants to make it absolutely clear that it rejects Catholic teaching on homosexuality.

But what is really interesting is the reaction of a diocesan official. According to the Times,

While Rodriguez maintains the ads represent the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, officials of the Diocese of El Paso said they do not.

“These paid advertisements are the personal views and opinions of Father Michael Rodriguez,” said the Rev. Anthony C. Celino, the vicar general and moderator of the curia for the diocese.

“Personal views and opinions”?  I hope I’m being charitable in saying that Fr. Celino’s grasp on authentic Catholic teaching seems a bit weak.

 

 

 

The NY Times Answer Man

August 11th, 2011, Promulgated by Mike

Klavan on the Culture makes frequent guest appearances at The American Catholic.  I thought this episode was worth sharing.

%CODE1%

H/T: Donald R. McClarey