From the New York Post:

“PORTLAND, Ore. ? The Boy Scouts of America has long kept an extensive archive of secret documents that chronicle the sexual abuse of young boys by Scout leaders over the years.

The “perversion files,” a nickname the Boy Scouts are said to have used for the documents, have rarely been seen by the public, but that could all change in the coming weeks in an Oregon courtroom.

The lawyer for a man who was molested in the 1980s by a Scout leader has obtained about 1,000 Boy Scouts sex files and is expected to release some of them at a trial that began Wednesday. The lawyer says the files show how the Boy Scouts have covered up abuse for decades.

The trial is significant because the files could offer a rare window into how the Boy Scouts have responded to sex abuse by Scout leaders. The only other time the documents are believed to have been presented at a trial was in the 1980s in Virginia.

At the start of the Oregon trial, attorney Kelly Clark recited the Boy Scout oath and the promise to obey Scout law to be “trustworthy.” Then he presented six boxes of documents that he said will show “how the Boy Scouts of America broke that oath.”

He held up file folder after file folder he said contained reports of abuse from around the country, telling the jury the efforts to keep them secret may have actually set back efforts to prevent child abuse nationally.

“The Boy Scouts of America ignored clear warning signs that Boy Scouts were being abused,” Clark said.

…

Dykes was convicted three times between 1983 and 1994 of sexually abusing boys, most of them Scouts.

Although there have been dozens of lawsuits against the organization over sex abuse allegations, judges for the most part have either denied requests for the files or the lawsuits have been settled before they went to trial.

The Boy Scouts had fought to keep the files being used in the Portland trial confidential. But they lost a pretrial legal battle when the Oregon Supreme Court rejected their argument that opening the files could damage the lives and reputations of people not a party to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit also named the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints because the Mormons acted as a charter organization, or sponsor, for the local Boy Scouts troop that included the victim [my emphasis]. But the church has settled its portion of the case.

…

The Portland case centers on whether the Boy Scouts of America did enough to protect boys from Dykes.

…

A spokesman for the Boy Scouts of America at its headquarters in Irving, Texas, said in a statement the organization cannot comment on details of the case. But it has worked hard on awareness and prevention efforts, including background checks.

“Unfortunately, child abuse is a societal problem and there is no fail-safe method for screening out abusers,” Deron Smith said.”

Commentary based on what the progressives have taught us from the Church sex abuse scandal (see here, here and here):

1. Clearly the Boy Scouts of America is an oppressive institution. They should be more welcoming and inclusive.

2. If women were permitted to become Boy Scout leaders, the culture of sex abuse would not exist, because women would have exposed these crimes long ago. Also, we all know that women do not commit sex abuse; only men (who are evil, oppressive creatures) do that.

3. If only the Boy Scout leaders did not have to live with mandatory celibacy. Scout leaders should be free to marry so that they do not become sexually frustrated and take out their sexual desires on little boys.

Tags: Orthodoxy at Work, Progressive Drivel

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 13th, 2010 at 3:42 PM . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.