Cleansing Fire

Defending Truth and Tradition in the Roman Catholic Church

Defending Pres. Trump against Pope Francis

September 12th, 2017, Promulgated by Diane Harris

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pro-life-america-rushes-to-defend-president-trump-against-popes-critic

|
Share this article

2017 Fall Bible Studies

September 11th, 2017, Promulgated by Diane Harris

The following is the bible study information we’ve received to date. 

Henrietta

A new bible study begins at St. Marianne Cope Parish, Wednesday evenings Sept. 13th, 7 – 8:30 PM at Guardian Angels (Room 4), repeated again on Thursday mornings Sept. 14th  at 9 – 10:30 AM at St. Joseph’s in Rush.  Ends in November. What were St Paul’s thoughts on the effect of encroaching worldly philosophies, the role of women, and what to do about the “end times”? You might be surprised and learn more if you join the study of Paul’s letters to the Thessalonians, Timothy, and Titus.   Contact Rick Halsted at rhalsted@frontiernet.net or the parish office at 585-334-3518.

Canandaigua

A new Catholic bible study is beginning Thursday morning, Sept. 14th, at 10:00 AM at 58 North Main Street in Canandaigua (parking in the lower lot behind the building).  We will be studying the Letter to the Hebrews, often attributed to St. Paul. Our goal is one chapter per week (not on Thanksgiving!) It is intended to be a group participation in the Holy Spirit, with an occasional guest speaker on particular topics.  Contact Barbara at 585-244-0395.

Geneva

New Bible Study on the “Parables of the Kingdom” Part 2 will study the Parable teachings of Jesus with a study guide, a commentary booklet and inspirational and educational video. Meets weekly on Thursday mornings at 10:30 AM starting on September 14 to October 19 for six sessions in Our Lady of Peace Parish Center (at St. Francis Church). Call the Rectory to sign up at 315-789-0930.

Waverly

Bible Study and Church History: “EPIC: A journey through Church History” begins the weekend of October 1, on Sundays at 10:30 AM, and on Wednesdays at 6:30 PM, at St. James Church. Contact Tom Ambury at 607-302-0917 or tbambury1@gmail.com for more information.

Charlotte

Year-round Bible Study on Thursdays begins October 5 at 7:00 PM in the Parish Conference Room. Fr. Jorge Ramirez’s Bible Study Group has the goal to know more about Holy Scriptures and how God reveals His love and mercy to all of us. The first semester will be an introduction to the Holy Scriptures: What is the Bible; division of the Bible; how to read it…. The second semester will focus on the Gospel of Mark and its relationship with the other synoptic gospels. For more information contact Fr. Jorge Ramirez at 585-663-2244.

Auburn

A new bible study begins September 18 through November 6, 2017, with Doug Taylor-Weiss, a convert to Catholicism and former Protestant Minister and adjunct professor at Northeastern Seminary in Rochester, and a parishioner at St. Mary’s Auburn where he is involved in Faith Formation and Bible Studies.  He will lead a study on the Letter to the Hebrews. Mondays at 7 PM for eight weeks at the Holy Family School Room #2. Contact the Parish Office at 315-252-9576.

 

ScreenShot721   ScreenShot722    ScreenShot720

(Stieglitz Collection)

|

Coming Soon! Bible Study Listings

September 3rd, 2017, Promulgated by Diane Harris

Bible studies in the Catholic tradition are not well-publicized. By the time we learn of one in which we might be interested, we’ve usually missed at least a few sessions. For the most part, such notices get buried as a page 3 insertion from time to time in Church bulletins.

ScreenShot702Under Canon Law and under the exhortations of Dei Verbum (Vatican II), the Faithful do have certain rights of access to the bible and for proper learning of the message of God to His people. We’ll be covering excerpts of that teaching in a later posting. For now, we are just asking readers to send (or provide as comments to this post) information on any scripture study of which you may be aware and which you believe will be consistent with Catholic Teaching. We’d like to compile a wide area list  especially in this Year of the Eucharist in the Rochester Diocese. We believe it will help conserve pastoral resources, and build networking among the laity.

Cleansing Fire plans to publish a list of bible studies intended to be in the Catholic Tradition, wherever they may be held in the Diocese of Rochester, including in people’s homes. Please mention which book(s) of the bible will be studied, dates, time and place of meetings, contact information and cost, if any. If there is a leader, please identify, and mention background if applicable. If it is a community study group without a leader, or using a DVD + discussion, it would be helpful to know that as well.

We can’t all be missionaries, but we can help to spread the Word of God.

Peace to all!

|

When a parish is needlessly divided …

September 3rd, 2017, Promulgated by Diane Harris

Most responsible leaders in the Church do recognize that unity must be around doctrinal issues, not around political or opinion issues. Most responsible leaders do not deliberately precipitate division in a parish, especially around matters of prudential judgment. And most responsible leaders, when quoting opinions of others, honor disputes with relevant quotes from both sides, acknowledge their own prejudices, use credible experts, and try to avoid sources with besmirched reputation. But Cris Wensel, pastoral associate of St. Matthew and St. Mary in Honeoye, isn’t like such responsible leaders.

In less than two months in her new position of responsibility, during the medical absence of the pastor, in my opinion she has already betrayed the trust that was put in her, making a bulletin first page extensive quote from the very controversial Vatican newbie, Fr. James Martin, S.J., who is a prime example of why a real Re-Suppression of the Jesuits is needed asap. It appears that the Jesuit Fr. Martin has been in the hot seat for two months since his controversial book and subsequent remarks on homosexuality. Here are the links to the most recent LifeSiteNews articles on Fr. Martin’s proclivities and opinions:

ScreenShot706

Who’s really responsible for Fr. James Martin’s revolution? (June 27)

Church leaders rip Fr. Martin’s new book on homosexuality (July 12)

Vatican adviser dismisses Catholic teaching, says God made gays ‘who they are’ (Aug. 22)

Pro-gay Vatican advisor: Some of my critics just fear their own ‘complicated sexuality’ (Aug. 24)

Vatican advisor urges gay priests to ‘come out,’ won’t say what his own ‘sexuality’ is (Aug 29)

Cardinal rebukes Vatican adviser’s critique of Church principles on LGBT issues (Sept. 1)

The self-proclaimed expert on homosexuality is apparently also a self-proclaimed expert on climate change as well. Cris Wensel quotes the very controversial Father Martin’s opinions to the parishioners of St. Matthew and St. Mary, without even adequately identifying the original source of his alleged comments:

ScreenShot703

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ScreenShot704

 

 

 

 

 

 

ScreenShot705In the spirit of full disclosure, I will make three points lest I also have a conflict of interest.

  1. I spent six months writing a response to Pope Francis’ Encyclical “Laudato Si.”  Not only do I believe that climate change is a hoax, but  I believe, more dangerously, it is an attempt to establish a one-world-religion based on pantheistic and socialistic principles. I have sent a copy of my book to the head of every diocese in the US, also offered also it free to Canadian bishops and sent copies to selected Vatican leaders, including both Pope Emeritus Benedict  XVI and Pope Francis.  I was generally quite pleased by the responses I received. Information is at www.hypotpublishing.com  I am not going to use this space to refute all of Fr. Martin’s allegations in defense of Laudato Si, which amount mostly to parroting the encyclical, as I’ve already spent over 200 pages arguing the opposite position. Father Martin does take on the “authority” however to determine what is and what is not a “moral” issue. That is important power grab; if it were a moral issue then it would imply Laudato Si might be binding, which I believe most Canon Law experts do not assert.
  2. Cris Wensel and I have a history of disagreement, some of which is on this Cleansing Fire blog site. “Search” for Wensel for pretty full disclosure. The first significant controversy occurred when she was using the feminine gender for the Holy Spirit. Her patron-pastor supported her, alleging that Bp. Bruskewitz supported the feminine use. I had the opportunity to speak with  Bishop Bruskewitz on a Catholic Radio call-in show, and the good bishop absolutely condemned such behavior, as God has revealed Himself to us under the male gender. If you would like to hear the brief recording of my call with Bishop Bruskewitz, please click here: http://cleansingfire.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Diane-with-Bishop-Fabian.wav   Cris and I have also had disagreement on ordination of women, and I have published in defense of the male priesthood and against feminists coveting ordination.
  3. It makes me particularly concerned, and I admit also angry, when people in the pew, especially the young and less catechized, are subjected to material such as was just published in the St. Mary / St. Matthew Church bulletin, particularly for those who have little ability to discern truth from pastoral ego. Their natural trust of their parish’s communications make them targets for what is not true. I would feel guilty were I not to challenge the assertions of someone arguing climate change is a moral issue, but that what is condemned clearly in Romans Chapter 1 is not!

P.S. All the above begs the question: “What should parishioners do when confronted with such an inappropriate article in their Church bulletin?” In my opinion, it is not enough to just go to the person who promulgates misunderstanding of our Faith, especially where they have a track record of rampant error, and there is no reason to believe a single personal complaint to the individual writer will prevent further abuse. Rather, I believe the article should be sent to Bishop Matano’s attention with charitable complaint. It is not only about stopping future error to protect our brothers and sisters in Christ, but also about trying to correct what has been already done. And His Excellency is the only one with the power to do both.  Peace!

Following the thread emerging on Fr. Martin and Petition to have him removed as a Vatican Advisor (Sept. 12) https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/pro-gay-vatican-adviser-gets-catholic-group-suspended-from-twitter1?utm_source=LifeSiteNews.com&utm_campaign=d56f185a47-Daily%2520Headlines%2520-%2520U.S.&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_12387f0e3e-d56f185a47-401405341

|

Monthly Prayer Requests for Priests – September 2017

September 2nd, 2017, Promulgated by Ben Anderson

It’s time to print out your September 2017 calendar. Thanks to the good folks at mprp-roc.org for providing these calendars freely available to all on the Internet.

Also, here are the Holy Father’s prayer intentions for September:

Parishes.

That our parishes, animated by a missionary spirit, may be places where faith is communicated and charity is seen.

|

Was Jesus illiterate? Part II of II

August 26th, 2017, Promulgated by Diane Harris

In Part I of this two part post, we looked at the scriptural references to Christ’s reading and writing to defend against the accusation that He was illiterate. In this Part II we look at the broader picture of literacy in the culture at the time of Christ, especially as reflected through Sacred Scripture, and ask if it is even ‘logical’ that the Son of God would be unable to read and write. How might Jesus have achieved that learning?

Is it ‘logical’ that the Son of God was unable to read and write?

While the scriptural references cited in Part I may well quell allegations that Christ could not read or write, there is also a certain logic to be examined. Do the most prominent writings of the time (Sacred Scripture in particular) imply that illiteracy was widespread, or not? Even given exceptions for government and religious elite, are there implications (or not) of a wider ability to read and write? While oral teaching was the most common, and people seemed to be better able to memorize in those times, should a wide population be painted with a brush of illiteracy, and Christ placed in that context? And, even if the population were illiterate, why might Christ have been an exception to any such prevailing cultural limitation? Is it logical that the Son of God, able to raise the dead, would be unable to read and write?

We will limit the discussion to three points:  1) What else might we learn from Scripture about the milieu of the times regarding literacy? 2) What unique opportunity might Christ have had to learn to read and write, and 3) Is there evidence that Jesus might have been “home-schooled?”

Was the ability to “read” at the time of Christ so rare as to suggest it was very unlikely that Christ would have been able to read?

Historically, we can look at just a few recorded fragments, such as Moses’ writing the Pentateuch many centuries earlier. The time-frame for the philosophers Socrates, Plato and Aristotle is also centuries before Christ. Part of the famed Library at Alexandria was burned by the Romans in 48 BC. (One doesn’t have a library without something to ‘house’ in it!) What about the preservation and study of the scriptural scrolls by the Essenes?

Heinrich Hofmann, 1881

Heinrich Hofmann, 1881

Studying the Hebrew Scriptures was common among Pharisees, Sadducees and Scribes, and study of the Talmud in preparation for becoming ‘adult’ in the faith (today – Bar Mitzvah) was usually required of the young men. Christ, Himself, who astounded the scholars when He remained behind in the Temple at the age of 12, probably read Hebrew in order to demonstrate His knowledge of the Scriptures, not for a moment or two but apparently over three days, as described in Luke Chapter 2: 46-47: “After three days they found Him in the temple, sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions; and all who heard Him were amazed at His understanding and His answers.”  The surprise of the teachers of the law indicates a much higher level than expected of learning shown by Christ, compared to other boys His age.

There are also seven New Testament quotations by Christ, asking: “Have you not read….?”  While such comment is often addressed to the religious leaders, who should be expected to have read, would Christ have made such accusations were He only ‘acting’ as if He could read? Would the religious leaders have missed an opportunity to embarrass Christ by revealing an inability to read on His part?

In the Gospel of John we learn that Pilate had a sign written and placed on the Cross, in three languages. The text (John 19:19-20) points out that it was read by many of the Jews: “Pilate also wrote a title and put it on the cross; it read, ‘Jesus of Nazareth, the King of the Jews.’ Many of the Jews read this title, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city; and it was written in Hebrew, in Latin, and in Greek.”  Thus, one may argue, that for “many” of the Jews to have read this, implies that “many” could read, unless we were to make the illogical argument that only well-educated people attended crucifixions!

Even the Ethiopian eunuch could read (Acts 8: 27-28) although he did not fully understand the sacred text. And still within the century of Christ, reading and writing was essential to communications in the early Church, typified by the letter from the Council of Jerusalem regarding circumcision, and the many letters to which we owe the teaching in the epistles. Those evangelized to Christianity came from all sectors of society. I would conclude that reading was not so rare that it suggests illiteracy on the part of all, including Jesus Christ. The better question would be “Why would Christ NOT have been literate?”

Did Christ have a unique opportunity to learn to read and write?

Perhaps the question revolves more about access to learning, than about not being a norm of the times. How does a poor foster son of a carpenter from Nazareth get educated? Luke leaves completely out of his infancy narrative the story which Matthew includes; i.e. the visit by the pagan kings (or perhaps of some Hebrew descent, given their interest in the birth of a king of the Hebrews.) That Mary and Joseph are poor is evidenced in Luke by the offering of a pair of turtledoves when Christ is presented at the Temple. But apparently they did “come into some money” soon thereafter, a development which seems not to often attract further focus.

"...and going into the house they saw the child with Mary his mother, and they fell down and worshiped him. Then, opening their treasures, they offered him gifts, gold and frankincense and myrrh."

“…and going into the house they saw the child with Mary his mother, and they fell down and worshiped him. Then, opening their treasures, they offered him gifts, gold and frankincense and myrrh.” (Art: Eastern Orthodox)

Given the appearance of the star at the time of Jesus’ birth, and the time it would take for a caravan to progress (Babylon to Jerusalem, and then to Bethlehem) we should remember that, in spite of crèche scenes, when the Magi arrived the Holy Family is no longer in a stable, but in a house (oikia)Christ is no longer an infant (brephos), but a toddler (paidion). And after the departure of the Magi, the Holy Family likely was no longer poor, having received gold, frankincense and myrrh. Thus, when the Holy Family arrives in Egypt, they have the means (in addition to Joseph’s carpentry) that God has provided to care for them. Egypt might also have yielded a place for some early education, and gold the means to provide for it.

We don’t know explicitly how long the Holy Family was in Egypt, but why should we ignore the 1260 days mentioned in Revelation 12:5-6: “… she brought forth a male child, one who is to rule all the nations with a rod of iron, but her child was caught up to God and to His throne, and the woman fled into the wilderness, where she had a place prepared by God, in which to be nourished for one thousand two hundred and sixty days.”  If, indeed, this may be applied to the Flight to Egypt, it would appear that the 1260 days (3 ½ years) added to about 1 ½ years in Bethlehem, would make Jesus at least 5 years old when the Holy Family returns to Nazareth, even older if significant travel time or delay is accounted. Therefore, it seems at least some education was possible in Egypt, reading and writing being most basic, perhaps even languages. It is interesting to muse how Moses also received education as a child in the House of Pharaoh, and the parallelism to God’s calling His Son(s) out of Egypt.

Was Jesus “Home-schooled?

ScreenShot699There is one other point, outside of the Canon of Scripture, which may still point to an education for the young Jesus. In the Protoevangelium of James (not part of the approved Canon, perhaps being unnecessary or perhaps containing some unidentified error), Mary is reported to have received education living in the Temple at Jerusalem, from age 3 to age 12, when (following the priestly directives) she was betrothed to Joseph, a widower with children of undisclosed age, and she left the Temple.

Keeping in mind that this book is not part of the Canon of Scripture, nevertheless, one notices references to what we already know in details surrounding the birth of Christ, such as the prominent role of Zachariah, but adding details, especially of Mary’s parentage, Anna and Joachim, figures named in a long tradition.

If, then, Mary received education during nine years living in the Temple (and why would she not?), it is hard to imagine that she would not have provided at least a basic education to Jesus, as well as spiritual training. Let the case rest here. Much that is hidden will someday be revealed.

Click to read further the excerpts from the Protoevangelium of James.
Read the rest of this entry »

|

Was Jesus illiterate? Part I of II

August 22nd, 2017, Promulgated by Diane Harris

First of a two-part post on whether or not Christ could read and write.

Recently, at a local garden party, I met a somewhat well-known Rochestarian who, within five minutes of introduction, had strongly asserted to me that Jesus had been “illiterate.” I have no idea why I was singled out to receive that missive, other than I’ve been facilitating a neighborhood bible study since 2014. The comment first provoked my surprise, and then my opposition to the premise. While I didn’t get the opportunity to list all my objections, it still seems worthwhile to archive the objections, and to give others the opportunity to respond. The Bible is a good place to start, where we have incidents of Jesus’ reading and writing.

Refutation from Sacred Scripture: Reading

According to Luke 4, 16-19, at the beginning of His public ministry, Christ went to Nazareth and read from the scroll in the synagogue. The New American Bible (NAB) uses the term “scroll” and the Revised Standard Version (RSV) uses “book” in the translation. In the Greek, the word is “Biblion”.

He came to Nazareth, where He had grown up, and went according to His custom into the synagogue on the sabbath day. He stood up to read and was handed a scroll of the prophet Isaiah. He unrolled the scroll and found the passage where it was written: ‘The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because He has anointed Me to bring glad tidings to the poor. He has sent Me to proclaim liberty to captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to let the oppressed go free, and to proclaim a year acceptable to the Lord.’ Rolling up the scroll, He handed it back to the attendant and sat down, and the eyes of all in the synagogue looked intently at Him.” (NAB) 

ScreenShot689The person premising the illiteracy to me argued that Christ had either memorized the passage, or was given the text phonetically (which would still require some kind of reading!) I am of the opinion that neither of these explanations refutes the argument that Christ could indeed read, and did read from the scroll, just as the text is presented to us, without deception. The pains Luke took in writing his Gospel to have Christ unroll the Biblion, to find the passage, to read it, to roll it up again, and to hand it back to the attendant all argue in favor of actual reading and not merely delivering a memorized excerpt. To fake reading would require deception not attributable to Him, Who is “The Way, the Truth, and the Life.”

 

Further, Luke identifies his own task (Chapter 1, 1-4) “to compile a narrative … just as …  delivered to us by … eyewitnesses … to write an orderly account … that you may know the truth.” There would seem to be no reason for Luke, having committed to such a challenge, to be unfaithful to his mission three chapters later.

Refutation from Sacred Scripture: Writing

Jesus wrote when He was presented with the woman caught in the act of adultery. In John, Chapter 8: 3-9, we read:

“The scribes and the Pharisees brought a woman who had been caught in adultery, and placing her in the midst they said to Him, “Teacher, this woman has been caught in the act of adultery. Now in the law Moses commanded us to stone such. What do You say about her?” This they said to test Him, that they might have some charge to bring against Him. Jesus bent down and wrote with His finger on the ground. And as they continued to ask Him, He stood up and said to them, ‘Let him who is without sin among you be the first to throw a stone at her.’ And once more He bent down and wrote with His finger on the ground. But when they heard it, they went away, one by one, beginning with the eldest, and Jesus was left alone with the woman standing before Him. Jesus looked up and said to her, “Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?” She said, ‘No one, Lord.’ And Jesus said, ‘Neither do I condemn you; go, and do not sin again’.” (RSV)

ScreenShot690What possible reason could there be to “contrive” Christ’s writing if He did not do so? Could not He have verbalized whatever He supposedly wrote, rather than writing it? Why would He choose to write?  There is some ‘understanding’ beyond the Scripture that He was writing sins, and by reminding them of their sins, the leaders who advocated stoning the woman left “one by one, beginning with the eldest (presumably with more lifetime sins.)”  Perhaps what we are seeing here is a gentleness of Christ, in not calling sins aloud, and embarrassing each person who left, but giving each the opportunity to leave quietly. Such an explanation (a kind of ‘seal of confession’) contributes even more to the opinions of those who believe He was writing down sins. Thus, the writing of sins might have been to protect even the accusers from individual identification of their sinfulness. The larger meaning, of course, brought home by the fear of being judged oneself, is that we are all sinners, and none of us should judge the other.

A Hidden Meaning?

Yet there is more to discover in Christ’s writing, than whatever it was He wrote, something which generally seems to be missed in preaching on the text. Was not Jesus also pointing to His own divinity and right to judge under the Law? Was He more than pointing? Was He actually manifesting His Sonship of His Father, the Almighty Lawgiver?  Doing what He sees His Father do (John 5:19)? There is an argument to be made in this regard; a possible potential hidden meaning.

Christ was “in the temple area teaching” when the Pharisees brought the woman to Him. Christ bends down to write. The text leads one to think that Christ is writing into sand, yet the ground in Israel is very hard. The Greek word for sand is ’ammos, and it does not appear in this text. Sand in the public areas also would inevitably be dragged from the more public places into the holier places, in a sense defiling the Temple by bringing what the Gentiles walked through into the inner courts. Rather, it seems likely that the ground within the temple area was hard, like stone or coral. The translation of the passages regarding Christ’s writing say He was writing ‘on’ the ground. The “ground” onto which Christ is said to write is ge in Greek, carrying the meaning most often of earth, and then of land. But how did Christ write “on” the ground? (Not with a magic marker!)

The Greek Scripture says He wrote:  “eis ton ge”  or “into the ground”. The first word, “eis”, appears 1774x in the New Testament, and in its most frequent use (573x) means “into.” It only means “on” 58x. Moreover, in the Gospel of John, it almost always means “into,” so why not in the verses about Christ’s writing “on” the ground? What seems to be missing may well be that Christ was actually writing “into” the ground, into the very hard ground that no solely human finger could penetrate. However, caught in their own concerns, to trap Jesus, to deliver the woman to stoning, and then for their own sins, the Pharisees once again missed the most obvious.

The first set of tablets of the 10 Commandments, given on Mt. Sinai, was carved in words by the finger of God. So it makes some sense to think that Christ’s writing was either specific sins or the commandment ScreenShot691transgressed, even though we do not know exactly what Christ wrote. Whatever the words, the finger of God cutting into stone is a hard image to ignore, a striking manifestation to miss of God’s own law-giving:

John 8:6a: “…Jesus bent down and wrote with His finger [into?] the ground.”

John 8:8:  “And once more He bent down and wrote with His finger [into?] the ground.”

Exodus 31:18: “And He gave to Moses, when He had made an end of speaking with him upon Mount Sinai, the two tables of the testimony, tables of stone, written with the finger of God.”

Deut 9:10: And the LORD gave me the two tables of stone written with the finger of God; and on them were all the words which the LORD had spoken with you on the mountain out of the midst of the fire on the day of the assembly.”

In Part II, we will look at whether or not it is even “logical” that the Son of God was unable to read and write.

|

Is it time to re-instate the Index for the good of souls?

August 18th, 2017, Promulgated by Diane Harris

Liberalism is a Sin begs the question of whether or not some type of Index is needed. With the distorted secular education being force-fed, the loss of faith-based schooling, and the accelerating increase in information (true or fake) and associated technology, it is sometimes difficult to distinguish the reliable from that which is not. A publication from 1899 provides some fodder for the discussion.

ScreenShot687

ScreenShot688

Consider, for example, Chapter 29 of Liberalism is a Sin entitled “Liberalism and Journalism,” vis à vis  Real and Fake News. Just a point for further discussion. Burning at the stake (author or book) not necessarily required or implied.

(While the Index of Prohibited Books was the exact list of books forbidden for Catholics to read, a more modern version might simply be the availability of such a list and the reasons for something to be included. Sort of a “not recommended” list and why.)

|

St. Bernard’s On the Road – YOTE

August 5th, 2017, Promulgated by Ben Anderson

From St. Bernard’s facebook page (p5 of the album)

When describing the Eucharist, the Catechism of the Catholic Church #1328 indicates that the “the inexhaustible richness of this sacrament is expressed in the different names we give it.” We’ve taken these names and each of the following presenters has prepared a 45-minute lecture/discussion that explores both the academic and spiritual insights into the Eucharist. Designed for adult faith enrichment, interested parishes should contact…

If you haven’t yet read Bishop Matano’s pastoral letter announcing the YOTE, you can do so here.

|

What about Spiritual Medals of Honor?

August 1st, 2017, Promulgated by Diane Harris

President Trump just made his first Medal of Honor award — to a true hero.

ScreenShot660To try to capture even a small part of what Vietnam War medic, Specialist V, James McCloughan of the US Army, did to deserve such recognition would inevitably understate his heroism. It is well worth the 21 minutes to view: https://youtu.be/kw4LrmzFMlM

After the entrance strains of “Hail to the Chief,” the words from the podium came from John 15:13:  Greater love has no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”  Christ said it; we believe it. And it is not difficult to see that martyrdom fits this description, if one is “friend” of God.

But what has a higher “value” than one’s own life? The answer is clear: one’s own soul!

But it seems that God does not accept that gift of sacrificing one’s own soul. Two instances arise in Sacred Scripture which are worth considering:

  • In Exodus Chapter 32, verses 31-33 provide some perspective.  After Aaron and the people had sinned in creating and worshiping the golden calf, Moses goes to God to try to obtain His forgiveness.  “So Moses returned to the LORD and said, ‘Alas, this people have sinned a great sin; they have made for themselves gods of gold. But now, if Thou wilt forgive their sin–and if not, blot me, I pray thee, out of thy book which Thou hast written.’  But the LORD said to Moses, ‘Whoever has sinned against Me, him will I blot out of My book.’”  So Moses offered to give up his own eternal life and God refused the gift.
  • In Romans, Chapter 9, verse 3, Paul states: “For I could wish that I myself were accursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen by race.” Paul, having the advantage of knowing what Moses said, and how God had responded, is more selective in the way he speaks, not to offend the God and giver of soul, yet still to write deeply of his love and care for the Jewish people. He “could” wish, though he seems not to so wish.

And, in these words, we confirm that there is no greater love than to lay down one’s life for one’s friend; it is not acceptable to lay down one’s soul, though the soul is greater than the earthly life. Yet, life is often lived inconsistently with this truth. Parents would jump into the ocean to save a child (even if the parent can’t swim) but will not risk potential alienation by correcting that same child’s adult moral lifestyle decisions. Friends, who might risk their own lives to save a friend from a terrorist attack, are too afraid of losing the friendship to speak clearly against a friend’s planned abortion.  A preacher hesitates to condemn a sin from the pulpit, lest the capital campaign falter. The examples are numerous. Esau traded his spiritual heritage for a bowl of porridge; the absurdity continues into today’s values, and lack of values, in effect offering their own souls, and others’ souls for the porridge of having ‘nice’ relationships.

A medal of honor is indeed a time to ponder where the virtue of courage works in our own lives, where we place priorities, and how we value not only our souls, but the souls of those who need to hear truth. Awesome!

|

Monthly Prayer Requests for Priests – August 2017

July 31st, 2017, Promulgated by Ben Anderson

It’s time to print out your August 2017 calendar. Thanks to the good folks at mprp-roc.org for providing these calendars freely available to all on the Internet.

Also, here are the Holy Father’s prayer intentions for August:

Artists.

That artists of our time, through their ingenuity, may help everyone discover the beauty of creation.

|

Fellowship of St. Alban Welcomes New Pastor

July 29th, 2017, Promulgated by Administrator

ScreenShot656Finally! The St. Alban’s Fellowship (Catholics belonging to the Personal Ordinariate of the Chair of Saint Peter) has a priest assigned – the recently ordained Father Evan Simington. The Fellowship is devoted to the liturgical practice of the Ordinariate form of the Roman rite, “Anglican Use”, worshiping in traditional English liturgical and musical expressions of the Catholic faith. Anyone who has not yet been to Catholic worship in the Anglican Tradition (fully approved by the Vatican), will especially note the solemnity and sacrality of this Divine Worship. By attending, all Catholics also fulfill their Sunday Mass obligation. The Fellowship is in full communion with the Roman Catholic Church and part of the Latin rite.  The U.S. Ordinariate was established following the Apostolic Constitution Anglicanorum Coetibus by Pope Benedict XVI and is under the protection of Our Lady of Walsingham.

Father Simington offers regular Sunday worship for their members and for all Catholics, at the historic Church of the Good Shepherd at 3318 East Henrietta Rd. on Sundays at 11:30 AM. This Sunday’s Mass will be for Craig Rideout and family. Confession is also available from 10:45-11:15 AM.

All are invited! Parish fellowship follows, with coffee and donuts. If you would like to make a request for Mass Intentions or you would like to add individuals to the Prayers of the People, please send your request to stalbanpray4us@gmail.com. Please make sure that you send your email before each Friday 9:00 pm to ensure that your request will be received in time for the following Sunday.

Holy Day of Obligation:

Solemnity of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary   Tuesday August 15th at 6:30 pm.

Group Study of Dei Verbum:

Beginning on Wednesday August 2nd, Father Simington will be leading a group study of the Second Vatican Council document Dei Verbum: Regarding the Church’s teaching on Divine RevelationHeld at 1702 Empire Blvd., Apt. 7.

For more information, visit:

http://www.stalbanfellowship.org/

https://www.facebook.com/StAlbanFellowship

http://ordinariate.net/photoalbums/2017-mass-of-ordination

 

Please keep Father Simington and St. Alban’s in your prayers as they embark together on this next step of their mission.

Prayer of Thanksgiving for the Most Holy Eucharist (from the Ordinariate Divine Office)

LORD, most glorious Lamb of God, most tender Priest of man, we praise and glorify thee for the blessed Sacrament of thy Body and Blood, wherein thy servants celebrate the mystery of thy redeeming love and partake of thy spotless and immortal life; and we beseech thee that by this most holy Eucharist we may be made holy, and have our portion and inheritance among the Saints who have pleased thee from the beginning of the world; to whom with the Father and the Holy Spirit be glory and dominion world without end. Amen.

|

FOCUS (Catholic campus outreach) coming to the University of Rochester

July 28th, 2017, Promulgated by Ben Anderson

FOCUS Expands to 15 New Campuses

This month, FOCUS is delighted to announce that the apostolate will be serving on 15 new campuses for the next academic year. In 2017 – 2018, more than 660 FOCUS missionaries will serve college students on 137 campuses.

Along with Kansas State University in Manhattan, Kansas, teams of FOCUS missionaries will also go to Iowa State University, Indiana University, the University of Rochester — and even the alma mater of FOCUS Founder Curtis Martin: Louisiana State University in Baton Rouge.

What FOCUS does:

We’re a campus outreach that pursues college students with intentionality and love. We invite them into a growing relationship with Jesus and the Catholic faith, inspiring and equipping them for a lifetime of Christ-centered evangelization, discipleship and friendships in which they lead others to do the same.

NOTE: This FOCUS is not the same as the local pregnancy care center – they just happen to share the same name.

|

THEOLOGY ON TAP Summer Series 2017

July 26th, 2017, Promulgated by Ben Anderson

From St. Jerome’s bulletin:

THEOLOGY ON TAP Summer Series 2017

Summer Nights Four Pack for Catholics and friends in their twenties and thirties!

Monday Nights at 7:00 p.m. at The Otter Lodge, 1776 Monroe Avenue , Rochester, NY 14618.

August 7, 2017 – Beyond Left and Right: The Appalling Strangeness of Catholic Moral Teaching With Dr. Matthew Kuhner.

August 14, 2017: Love and Lies: Theology of the Body. With Michelle Kuhner, M.T.S. August 21, 2017 The Real Presence: I Believe…Do You? With Fr. Peter VanLieshout.

August 28, 2017: Discernment for Your Life: How to Recognize When God is Speaking to You With Sister Laurie Orman.

Theology on Tap is an opportunity for young adults to gather to discuss and reflect on issues of faith. Sponsored by the Diocese of Rochester Department of Evangelization & Catechesis.

|

Fr. Rosica — Part of the Problem?

July 18th, 2017, Promulgated by Diane Harris

In my opinion, Fr. Thomas Rosica, a Basilian priest cultivated in the troublesome soil of Rochester’s historic spiritual politics, is a significant part of the problem rather than the solution. What problem? Proclaiming truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, rather than seeming to toy with the political exigency of a social agenda.  I have only heard Fr. Rosica speak twice, and both left me with an uncomfortable feeling. The first was around the time of election of Pope Francis, a speech and Q&A at St. Ambrose, which I thought was highly orchestrated to avoid several problem areas, but which were revealed much later. The second was the eulogy at the funeral for Fr. Joe Lanzalaco, in which Fr. Rosica left out completely the pro-life work and support given by Fr. Joe, and it had to be added by others at the final blessing. I wondered why that happened.

Ensconced in the secular permissive environment of Canada, with a bevy of dinner table vignettes from a few years in Rome during Pope Francis’ reign, Fr. Rosica, not surprisingly, recently jumped to the defense of Fr. James Martin, S.J., by attacking those guilty of preaching 2000 years of Church Teaching.  Putting aside for now the obvious need for a serious Reformation of the Jesuits, Fr. Martin slid in under the radar of good Catholics by first publishing his acclaimed but simplistic book: “My Life with the Saints,” to now infiltrate with his seeming opposition to Church Teaching, with his latest book “Building a Bridge….”

Pause here for a moment.

ScreenShot649Fr. Martin cleverly picks the bridge image to apparently align with and mimic Pope Francis’ criticism of a border wall during the US Presidential election, and the Pope’s call for bridges, not walls.  But as best I can remember, none of the Vatican criticism of border walls took into account the Wall around Jerusalem, biblically justified in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah as a response to God’s call for protecting the returning Israelites from attack. So Fr. Martin ironically uses a title which is more of a bridge to sin than a protection of virtue. The full title and subtitle? “Building a Bridge: How the Catholic Church and the LGBT Community Can Enter into a Relationship of Respect, Compassion, and Sensitivity.”

One can justifiably wonder why no one has written a book entitled: “Building a Bridge: How the Catholic Church and the _____________ (Fill in: contraceptive, abortive, euthanasiac, pedophiliac, arsonist, drug-addicted, adulterous, or heretical) _______ community can enter into a relationship of respect, compassion, and sensitivity.” Outrageous? Yes. But what is really outrageous is the selection of one sin as “special,” worthy of being singled out and protected, at least by language choice. But language is the very point of Fr. Martin’s attack, and of support from Fr. Rosica, who himself was apparently very involved in the news releases from the Synod, and necessarily the ambiguity therein. And homosexuality was one of the initial glaring points of mis-translation into English (Fr. Rosica’s work?) from the original which in Italian which was reported as marriage being between one man and one woman, but the English version translated as marriage being between two people. This kind of language is directly related to making sin more attractive by not calling it sin. (For those who don’t really know what the bible says about same-sex intimate relations, see the story of Sodom and Gomorrah and also St. Paul’s words in the last half of Romans Chapter 1, lest there be a doubt.) If ever we are threatened by changes to the bible, Romans Chapter 1 will probably be the first to go.

LifeSiteNews: a boon to Catholics trying to find some truth

For the LifeSiteNews story regarding Fr. Rosica’s support of Fr. Martin (and resulting attack on good, faithful prelates) see: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/vatican-consultant-fr.-rosica-slams-apb.-chaput-for-defending-catholic-sexu?utm_source=LifeSiteNews.com&utm_campaign=40ebbaad81-Catholic_7_17_2017&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_12387f0e3e-40ebbaad81-402220649

LifeSiteNews and Fr. Rosica (or his Salt and Light Network) have had their run-ins before, and Fr. Rosica at one point was reported as bringing a lawsuit against an elderly retiree who was criticizing him, although the lawsuit (or threat of one) was ultimately withdrawn or not filed. But Fr. Rosica apparently continues with his vitriol against bloggers, priests as well as laity, exercising their canonical rights. Are they sometimes harsh or ill-considered? Perhaps. But one need not be perfect to bring a righteous complaint.

Excerpts

Here are some excerpts (in red) from the LifeSiteNews article, which hopefully will add much more to the concerns expressed above:

“Fr. Rosica, a Basilian priest and CEO of the Canadian-based Salt and Light Media, wrote …  he was filled with “bewilderment” and “astounded” after reading “critical comments” of Fr. James Martin’s book. He specifically mentioned that he was referring to “some bishops’ messages” as well as some “commentaries” and “blogs.” [Believed to refer to the beautiful defense of Church Teaching by Archbishop Chaput, or possibly also related to diocesan policy implemented by Bishop Paprocki.]

“To use clerical status, episcopal authority, or other forms of leadership to dismiss, disparage or slam the efforts of those who simply want to reach those on the peripheries is not befitting of shepherds, pastors or servants of the Lord. It has nothing to do with the Gospel! It is not who we are!” he wrote. [Well, that is indeed an odd statement attributed to Fr. Rosica.  It has EVERYTHING to do with the Gospel.  Christ said: “If you love Me, keep My commandments.” He didn’t single any out for special tolerance.]

“[Abp.] Chaput said that while Martin is correct in stating that the Church must have “respect, compassion and sensitivity in dealing with persons with same-sex attraction,” this does not give a license to him or other influential leaders within the Church to ignore Biblical teaching on sexuality.” [I give thanks for the excellent and faithful pastoral care which Abp. Chaput evidences on a national basis!]

“What the text regrettably lacks is an engagement with the substance of what divides faithful Christians from those who see no sin in active same-sex relationships,” the archbishop wrote …. that Jesus “didn’t come to affirm us in our sins and destructive behaviors – whatever they might be — but to redeem us.”

“Fr. Martin in his June 2017 book … urges Catholics who identify as “gay” to begin “conversations” with their bishops in a bid to slowly move the Church in the direction of normalizing homosexuality as part of God’s creation.”

“…  canon law expert Fr. Gerald Murray added his voice to criticism of Fr. Martin’s book. Fr. Martin is advocating for the “relaxation of the Church’s teaching that sodomy is gravely immoral and that any attraction to commit acts of sodomy is an objective disorder in one’s personality,” wrote Murray. … “An inclination toward unnatural sexual activity is not the heart and soul of a person. True love is expressed in virtuous deeds. Evil inclinations or tendencies to sin must be seen by the Christian for what they are, and resisted,” he added. 

“In his column, Fr. Rosica criticized faithful Catholics who use social media to defend genuine Catholic sexual ethics, calling their writings the “dark, dysfunctional side of the Catholic blogosphere.” He accused them of “erecting high, impenetrable walls and noisy echo chambers of monologue.” … Rosica then criticized the Catholic teaching that calls the homosexual inclination “intrinsically disordered,” saying that “such vocabulary does not invite people into dialogue nor does it build bridges.”  [Well, as best I can recollect, “intrinsically disordered” was used with great clarity by Pope Benedict XVI. Obfuscating meaning, as we’ve seen far too often during the reign of Pope Francis, serves no one. The Holy Spirit is not a Spirit of confusion.]

“… Cardinal Robert Sarah wrote that bishops and priests perform a disservice to same-sex attacked persons when they withhold from them Catholic teaching on homosexuality….[The Church teaches] things in the Catechism about homosexuality that some members of the clergy choose not to quote, including the clear warning: ‘under no circumstances can [homosexual acts] be approved’ (CCC 2357). The respect and sensitivity to which the Catechism rightly calls us does not give us permission to deprive men and women who experience SSA (same-sex attraction) of the fullness of the Gospel. To omit the ‘hard sayings’ of Christ and his Church is not charity,” he wrote.” 

|

Please don’t touch my tongue — comments?

July 4th, 2017, Promulgated by Hopefull

I think it is time to post on something relevant to the Year of the Eucharist, and to encourage comments on a subject for which almost every communicant seems to have an opinion, and nobody is saying anything. First, let’s say what this is not — it is not about changing any church policy.  It’s not about any particular church or priest. It’s more about awareness and care, and ultimately even more reverent reception of the Eucharist.

To recap current practice, and risk oversimplifying:

1) the Novus Ordo (OF) permits receiving the sacred host in the hand or on the tongue, and allows the celebrant to offer the Precious Blood to the congregation, or not.  Most (but not all) parishes long ago ripped out their altar rails, making kneeling or rising again from the floor of the church, unaided, difficult for some of us. Therefore, Novus Ordo communicants principally receive communion by standing in line.

2) the Latin Mass (EF), while not widely available in most dioceses, in my limited experience, only makes the sacred host available on the tongue, kneeling, at an altar rail or kneeler where available.

What I want to dialogue about here is tongue-touching. It’s bad enough from a priest, but from the lay Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion in the Novus Ordo, positively yucky — IMO. It must be yucky to them too! (It was for me, when I was a “Eucharistic Minister” as the title was in those days.) Of course it does not change WHO we are receiving, nor the awesome gift of the Eucharist, but it is a distraction at a moment when we most want to be recollected, thankful, intimate with the Lord. (And even thinking “Please, don’t touch my tongue” is, itself, a distraction.) For the most part, I think tongue-touching is unnecessary, could be avoided with a bit more awareness.

Pope Benedict’s Preference:

During Pope Benedict’s last visit to the US he gave Communion on the tongue and only to recipients kneeling. See excerpt below and picture from the Vatican Website:  http://www.vatican.va/news_services/liturgy/details/ns_lit_doc_20091117_comunione_en.html

That fact alone makes receiving on the tongue worth considering, even for diehard “in the hand” communicants.

Three observations:

  1. When the smaller hosts began to be used, I wondered if it were a plot to force us all to receive in the hand. The incidence of tongue-touching increased, it seemed, with use of the smaller host, understandably so. I don’t really see any good reason for the smaller hosts, except perhaps for First Communicants?
  2. It appears to me that the OF moving Communion line introduced more risk of dropping the Eucharist, even when someone is receiving in the hand. And bowing, saying “Amen” before the host is received, then quickly getting out of the way for the next person is, in itself, a distraction. I actually think the priest walking down the line at the altar rail is quicker, without rushing the communicant, but I’m not sure there is less tongue-touching, as the priest may have a more obscured view, a greater distance from his eye to the communicant’s tongue, than in the communion line. (BTW — I was instructed in growing up with the Latin Mass NOT to rise until the person beside me had already received for two reasons: 1) to avoid stumbling, falling into the priest or onto the Eucharist, but 2) also to avoid distracting the person receiving. Sometimes, with kneelers, it isn’t possible to delay.)
  3. In the last few years, I’ve noticed (again, in my limited experience) that there are two ways of placing the host on the tongue. The most common way is that the priest’s index finger is below the tongue, and his thumb above. Virtually all the tongue touching experiences I’ve had were in this configuration, underneath and out of the priest’s view. But the other configuration is with the thumb (just the tip of the thumb) on the bottom and the index finger on top. Although I’ve had no tongue-touching in this configuration, perhaps it isn’t common enough for any valid statistics? I’ve also noticed this configuration allows the priest to press gently on the host if there seems to be a danger of its falling.

So what do you think? And does it vary by whether we are in flu season or not? Or if your health is already compromised? Do you ever choose from whom to receive Communion based on your past track record with a particular priest or Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion? Is it a distraction at Communion waiting for a wet finger jolt? Why does this seem to be too sensitive to talk about?

ScreenShot626

“Oh where have they laid my Lord?”

         On July 22, Feast of St. Mary Magdalene,         

the following clipping was added here:

ScreenShot653

|

Sniff, sniff…. Smoke of Satan?

June 30th, 2017, Promulgated by Diane Harris

This means fewer Masses will be celebrated, doesn’t it?

That’s not a good thing, is it?

Pray for priests.

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2017/06/de-mattei-francis-imposes.html

 

|

Huh?

June 27th, 2017, Promulgated by Diane Harris

Somebody help me out here. I’m having a lot of trouble understanding this:

ScreenShot621ScreenShot620

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oh, Dear Lord, a friend just sent me the link.

http://youtu.be/odKk8eUhFx8

This was done at St. John Lateran on the Feast of Corpus Christi, June 18, 2017.

Christ have mercy.

 

ScreenShot622

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplement posted June 30th: Thanks to “G.S.” for sending the following link, which explains a lot:

http://www.gruppoilva.com/en/stories/2017-05-18/ilva-employees-pay-tribute-pope-francis

Originally, my concern was removing the Corpus of Christ from the Cross on — of all days — Corpus Christi! Now the link explains this is a commercial “thank you!” Double yikes! Doesn’t this open the door for all kinds of “thank you” gestures which are only thinly veiled commercials? Like the environmental color dance on the walls of St. Peter’s Basilica, where are the limits between God and mammon to be? “Chapel of St. Stephen brought to you by Saul’s Rock Quarry?” or “This confessional sponsored by “Piece of Peace Eternal Enterprises”? or how about “Sanctuary sponsored this month by Wholly Natural Foods, Inc.?”  STOP!

Mat 6:2-4: “Thus, when you give alms, sound no trumpet before you, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may be praised by men. Truly, I say to you, they have received their reward. But when you give alms, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your alms may be in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you.”

And leave the naming rights and image promotion to the baseball and football stadia, puleeze!

 

|

DoR co-patron St. Thomas More

June 22nd, 2017, Promulgated by Diane Harris

Today is the Memorial of the two patron saints of the Diocese of Rochester: St. John Fisher and St. Thomas More. Often the former, the only Catholic prelate in England under Henry VIII to refuse to recognize Henry as head of the Church of England and thus be martyred, gets more attention than the family man who was martyred for the same reasons as Fisher. It was Sir Thomas More, knighted, who was also martyred and shares today’s remembrance.

From the Tower of London, where St. Thomas More was imprisoned, he wrote with charcoal his famous words of finding forgiveness for even the most heinous crimes. Here are his memorable words, reprinted in his book “The Sadness of Christ”:

ScreenShot614

 

ScreenShot613

|

Finally — Dubia moves forward!

June 20th, 2017, Promulgated by Hopefull

Dubia moves sadly, but relentlessly forward.

|